Field Dispatch
Latin Music Litigation | Matt Connarton Unleashed
Speaker 1: Billboard dot Com has this article up. Here are Latin
Speaker 1: music's biggest lawsuits and legal cases, including Bad Bunny, Daddy Yankee,
Speaker 1: and more. I remember Daddy Yankee, and of course we
Speaker 1: all know Bad Bunny. It says here. Latin music stars
Speaker 1: are facing big legal battles, including a massive reggae tone case,
Speaker 1: a nasty divorce turned rico suit, and a looming fight
Speaker 1: over a leaked sex tape. Oh my goodness, Well, so
Speaker 1: much going on in the world of Latin music. For
Speaker 1: some reason, that seems to be the most litigious genre
Speaker 1: at the moment, which is why we're talking about it.
Speaker 1: There's always like hip hop always has a lot of lawsuits,
Speaker 1: and you know, and there's always there's always lawsuits in
Speaker 1: every genre of music. But right now Latin music seems
Speaker 1: to be where a lot of attorneys are able to
Speaker 1: charge legal fees. It says here. Latin music is as
Speaker 1: popular as ever, which is true. As a genre, it's
Speaker 1: really exploded. So it makes sense that stars like Bad
Speaker 1: Bunny are embroiled in a growing number of major legal
Speaker 1: battles in US courts. As the old music lawyer adage goes,
Speaker 1: where there's a hit, there's a writ In other words,
Speaker 1: where there's where there's hit songs, there's money to be
Speaker 1: made and someone to sue very often. The genre has
Speaker 1: boomed in recent years, becoming the fastest growing core music
Speaker 1: genre in the US and hitting a record breaking one
Speaker 1: point four billion in revenue in twenty twenty four, making
Speaker 1: the genre's third consecutive year passing one billion dollars. The
Speaker 1: Recording Industry Association of America's Matt Bass said in an
Speaker 1: October report, quote, Latin music is the in the US
Speaker 1: continues to gain popularity and generate generate increased value thanks
Speaker 1: to the incredible artists whose music connects across language and
Speaker 1: geographical barriers. Unquote. All that explosive growth again, this is
Speaker 1: from Billboard. All that explosive, explosive growth has been fueled
Speaker 1: not only by the global superstardom of Bad Bunny, who
Speaker 1: played this year's Super Bowl and cleaned up at the
Speaker 1: Grammy Awards, but also by the rise of artists like
Speaker 1: Colombian star Carol g or Carole. It might be Corole.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure, ka r o L. It looks like Carol,
Speaker 1: but it might probably not. Carol doesn't sound like a
Speaker 1: particularly Latin sounding name, does it, Carol, it's probably corole
Speaker 1: g and regional Mexican powerhouses, and I'm sure I'm going
Speaker 1: to butcher these apologize in advance. Fuere's a Regeda and
Speaker 1: or Regeta and pezo Pluma or peso pluma. But with
Speaker 1: great success comes great disputes. Reggaetne stars like Bad Bunny
Speaker 1: himself for facing unprecedented liation over how key elements of
Speaker 1: their music are covered by copyright laws. This is where
Speaker 1: it gets interesting and something we talk about all the
Speaker 1: time on the show. This always comes up, copyright infringement,
Speaker 1: copyright laws, intellectual property, all of it. Especially with the
Speaker 1: rise of AI. Other big names like Dell Records founder
Speaker 1: Angel DVR are fighting criminal charges that could put them
Speaker 1: behind bars for years. Still, others like Daddy Yankee are
Speaker 1: using the courts to bring their own stunning allegations against others.
Speaker 1: To get you up to speed, here's Billboard's quick guide
Speaker 1: to Latin music's major lawsuits, criminal cases, and legal battles.
Speaker 1: We break down five major cases and everything you need
Speaker 1: to know about them, followed by five more key legal
Speaker 1: disputes to watch in the months ahead. So I don't
Speaker 1: know that we'll get through all these. We'll try to
Speaker 1: speed through these because there's a lot here. Okay, so
Speaker 1: reggae tones jaw dropping copyright case, this is the first one.
Speaker 1: There is no bigger Latin music legal battle than the
Speaker 1: sprawling copyright lawsuit over the origins of reggaetnes dembo rhythm.
Speaker 1: The boom of boom boom chick, boom of boom chick
Speaker 1: used in nearly Oh yeah, it used in nearly every
Speaker 1: song in the genre. Yeah, you know exactly what I'm
Speaker 1: even though I know exactly even though I'm butchered it.
Speaker 1: We all know exactly what that is because we all
Speaker 1: hear it. You know, if you're in Manchester on a
Speaker 1: summer day when everyone's got their windows down in their cars,
Speaker 1: you'll certainly hear that coming out of many many cars.
Speaker 1: We hear it in our neighborhood quite a bit. That
Speaker 1: If you don't know what that is, let me see
Speaker 1: if I can do it again, but but not do
Speaker 1: it so clumsily. The boom che boom chick, boom che
Speaker 1: boom chick use. And I wish I knew how to beatbox,
Speaker 1: I could replicate that perfectly. But you all know what
Speaker 1: that is. The case claims that crucial Now, this is interesting.
Speaker 1: I've wondered about this. So the case here claims that
Speaker 1: that crucial element was essentially stolen from a single nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty nine song, and that it's time for the music
Speaker 1: business to pay up. So that beat, that rhythm that
Speaker 1: you hear in all those reggaetone songs that you hear
Speaker 1: coming out of everybody's cars in the summertime, that's really
Speaker 1: that young. I thought it was older than Somebody has
Speaker 1: traced that back to a single from nineteen eighty nine
Speaker 1: and says pay me. The scale of the case is staggering.
Speaker 1: It targets bad Bunny Corol, I still say, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: say Corol, G Daddy Yankee and more than one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty other artists as defendants, plus units of all
Speaker 1: three major music companies, claiming that nearly two thousand of
Speaker 1: their songs were illegal. If successful, it would mean that
Speaker 1: almost all reggaetone artists would need to pay licensing fees
Speaker 1: to use are aspect of the genre. I don't think
Speaker 1: this lawsuits going to be successful to you, especially, I
Speaker 1: think it's that young, especially since now there will be
Speaker 1: dispute over this detail. By the way, We're definitely not
Speaker 1: gonna get through all these, but this one's fascinating to me.
Speaker 1: We might just stay on this one for a while.
Speaker 1: Gene Simmons was saying it was in you know, when
Speaker 1: he the little controversy it blew over fairly quickly about
Speaker 1: who wrote the song Beth, and he was saying Peter
Speaker 1: didn't really write it, and Jane was making some rather
Speaker 1: ignorant comments about Peter's not a real musician because he's
Speaker 1: a drummer, so he's not technically a musician because you can't.
Speaker 1: You can't copyright, you can't trademark a beat like you
Speaker 1: can a melody or something, which actually is definitely not true.
Speaker 1: He's wrong about that. I'm sure there are very specific,
Speaker 1: very specific beats that have been copy copyright Well, that's
Speaker 1: you're talking about a bassline. But but I'm sure I
Speaker 1: can't think of a really gonna be a baseline and
Speaker 1: a drum No, but but but how can you call
Speaker 1: a drummer not a musician the same? Right? His comment
Speaker 1: was very very ignorant and he does know better. But
Speaker 1: but but I'm sure, I'm sure it's happened. I'm sure
Speaker 1: there have been specific beats have been copyrighted. But to
Speaker 1: but to, I mean, how's this gonna going? How are
Speaker 1: you gonna You're gonna sue all? You're gonna basically sue
Speaker 1: an entire genre over over a beat that is very
Speaker 1: common money grap So it says here. As experts previously
Speaker 1: told Billboard, the case could have a disruptive effect on
Speaker 1: reggae tone Yeah no kidding, a booming genre that's risen
Speaker 1: alongside Bad Bunny from the clubs of Puerto Rico to
Speaker 1: the very top of the global music business. This case
Speaker 1: is jaw dropping, said Jennifer Jenkins, a Duke University law professor. Quote.
Speaker 1: If they win, this would confer a monopoly over an
Speaker 1: entire genre. Vote. A judge refused to dismiss the case
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four, and following a key hearing in December,
Speaker 1: it's now primed for a major ruling on crucial questions,
Speaker 1: which will determine whether the lawsuit is dismissed or can
Speaker 1: move ahead to a jury trial. Stay tuned. I predict
Speaker 1: it's dismissed. I hope though, because that would be quite
Speaker 1: a bit of waste of money, waste of time. Yes,
Speaker 1: we'll try to privolous. Oh yeah, we'll try to get
Speaker 1: a couple more of these and Daddy Yankees bombshell divorce battle.
Speaker 1: I don't even remember what Daddy Yankee's big hit was.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're like in the Yankees. No, no, damn no,
Speaker 1: this is damn Yankees is not a Latin band. Oh yeah, sorry, no,
Speaker 1: Daddy Yankee, Daddy Yankee, I don't remember what the big
Speaker 1: hit were. I remember, I can't hear anything out of
Speaker 1: my writing, I know. In December twenty twenty four, Daddy
Speaker 1: Yankee again this is from Billboard, filed for divorce from
Speaker 1: his wife of thirty years. The two have been duking
Speaker 1: it out in court ever since, not just over the
Speaker 1: marriage dissolution, but the bombshell accusations of stolen money, defamation,
Speaker 1: and racketeering. A few weeks after the divorce started, Yankee
Speaker 1: sought an injunction over accusations that I'm gonna butcher this. MERIDIESE.
Speaker 1: Gonzales had withdrawn tens of millions from his El Cartel Records,
Speaker 1: his record company. Then in March twenty twenty five, he
Speaker 1: fouled the lawsuit, claiming he discovered mismanagement and a defamatory
Speaker 1: campaign by Gonzalez, though that case later settled. Daddy Yankee
Speaker 1: went nuclear in December, filing a Rico lawsuit against Gonzalez
Speaker 1: and his former manager Rayfie Pina or Pena, of scheming
Speaker 1: to steal songwriting royalties during a nearly decade long racketing
Speaker 1: conspiracy in which they quote systematically inappropriate misappropriated publishing income unquote.
Speaker 1: Her lawyer denied the accusations at the time, telling Billboard
Speaker 1: they were a fabrication created by Daddy Yankee to gain
Speaker 1: a tactical advantage in their divorce proceedings, but the case
Speaker 1: remained pending. Uh. Okay, this one we're gonna skip. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna we have limited time. We're gonna get one more in,
Speaker 1: but I'm gonna find I want to find one that
Speaker 1: looks like it's quick and uh, the sex tape one
Speaker 1: will skip because it's a Saturday morning morning. Yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: let's do this other bad bunny one quickly. Yes, I
Speaker 1: was gonna re mentioned mosaic. Yeah, let's do that. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what. We'll share the link out to this
Speaker 1: article on social media because there are some other interesting cases.
Speaker 1: But I think we we tackled the h the two
Speaker 1: that are the most interesting. But it's at billboard dot com.
Speaker 1: The title of the article is here are Latin music's
Speaker 1: biggest lawsuits and legal cases, including Bad Bunny, Daddy, Yankee,
Speaker 1: and more So. We do love a good uh, a
Speaker 1: good lawsuit in the music industry. It's always fascinating and
Speaker 1: there's always somebody issuing somebody. It's a very re litigious industry.
Podbean