Field Dispatch
Matt Connarton Unleashed 9-25-25 w/Todd Ayer
Speaker 1: Get command, don't get supremely magxell coming. Hey, welcome everybody,
Speaker 1: Here we go. It is the podcast version AF, as
Speaker 1: we call it mcu AF. Matt Connorton unleashed the online
Speaker 1: only edition of the show today is Thursday's September twenty five,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, And joining me, of course, is Todd Air.
Speaker 2: Hello, Todd, Hey, how are you today? Matt?
Speaker 1: I say, of course, because I'm used to saying, you know,
Speaker 1: welcome to Hanging Left. So of course Todd is with me.
Speaker 1: So if for anyone who's for the uninitiated, if you're
Speaker 1: not familiar, Todd and I do a podcast together called
Speaker 1: Hanging Left, but today we were gonna do Jenny and
Speaker 1: I were going to do Matt Connorton unleashed a live
Speaker 1: podcast edition with Sarah Sarah Chatzunski, who I know is
Speaker 1: under the weather, but you and I Todd had a
Speaker 1: great conversation with Sarah on Hanging Left absolutely a number
Speaker 1: of weeks ago. And of course you're you're obviously involved
Speaker 1: in the campaign. Yeah, so it made sense for you
Speaker 1: to step in in her place today as her voice
Speaker 1: is not uh uh where it needs to be to
Speaker 1: do something like.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, you know, it's the being out on the
Speaker 2: trail and and really you know, being that voice for
Speaker 2: people that don't have a voice. You know, sometimes you
Speaker 2: literally lose your voice. It takes a lot out of you. So,
Speaker 2: you know, we just we have her. Uh you know,
Speaker 2: she's a little under the weather. So I said to her, hey,
Speaker 2: you know, take a step back, you know, get your
Speaker 2: get yourself up and ready to go again so we
Speaker 2: can be at one hundred percent because she is a
Speaker 2: human after all.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, we're we're getting into that time of year,
Speaker 1: cold and flu season and all that goes with it.
Speaker 1: Absolutely so, uh so what can you tell us about
Speaker 1: how things are going with the campaign? Well, and of
Speaker 1: course for people who don't know, we should also of
Speaker 1: course talk about the seat that Sarah is running for
Speaker 1: and uh you know, kind of give people some background.
Speaker 2: Sure, So we are running for the what will be
Speaker 2: the open seat in Congress, which is District one and
Speaker 2: currently held by Christopher Pappus of uh you know, a
Speaker 2: Manchester who owns uh The Puritan, and he is going
Speaker 2: to be moving over to the Senate and our goal
Speaker 2: is to actually uh you know, partner with him and
Speaker 2: and be in that role as the congressman, as well
Speaker 2: as with Senator Maggie Goodlander, who handles the district two.
Speaker 1: Okay, ye, so uh so why is uh, why is
Speaker 1: Sarah running for this? What? What is uh? What is
Speaker 1: the objective here?
Speaker 2: So? I think you know, the people really have spoken
Speaker 2: pretty loudly about the fact that they need some real
Speaker 2: humans in the race, you know, and just to add,
Speaker 2: you know, some reality and some sort of grounding effects
Speaker 2: to Congress currently as it is. So you know Sarah's goal.
Speaker 2: She does have a strong background in international relations, specifically
Speaker 2: with the Ukraine. She even helped broker a sixty four
Speaker 2: billion dollar deal to get the Ukraine the necessary funding
Speaker 2: to defend themselves as a sovereign state. So you know,
Speaker 2: her idea basically is that, you know, why not I
Speaker 2: have all this ability, I have the ability to build bridges,
Speaker 2: and certainly this is the time to build bridges and
Speaker 2: not burn them, and so why not work towards you know,
Speaker 2: and use my connections and the respect I've gotten Washington
Speaker 2: and internationally and and you know, defend people really and
Speaker 2: defend this country because we we you know, democracy is
Speaker 2: definitely it's it's it's it's not so stable, right, now,
Speaker 2: you know, I mean, we still have it intact, but
Speaker 2: you know, there are definitely challenges going on right now.
Speaker 2: So it's important that someone like Sarah comes out right
Speaker 2: from the start and says, look, you know, democracy is
Speaker 2: as an experiment. You know, it's a it's a messy
Speaker 2: experiment at times, but it's something you have to work for. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you can't take it for granted. And so she's standing
Speaker 2: up and showing people that, you know, she's basically practicing
Speaker 2: what she preaches, and she's out there defending democracy. So really,
Speaker 2: we're in this election and she's in this election. It's
Speaker 2: really not about us. It's really about everyone, and it's
Speaker 2: about you know, giving the people a voice again and
Speaker 2: in an authentic voice. That's important, and people that they
Speaker 2: can trust that truly have their back. I mean, I
Speaker 2: think people really want someone that they can trust that
Speaker 2: has their back, and Sarah we call it like to
Speaker 2: color Sarah c it's a little easier, but yeah, Sarah,
Speaker 2: Sarah's that person.
Speaker 1: I do want to mention for people who are streaming
Speaker 1: the show live. Obviously most people will get this in
Speaker 1: the podcast and the podcast feed for Matt connorton Unleashed,
Speaker 1: which you can find on all your major podcast platforms.
Speaker 1: But if you do happen to be streaming the show
Speaker 1: live on late Thursday afternoon early evening on September twenty fifth, uh,
Speaker 1: feel free to comment in the chat room. We do
Speaker 1: have the chat room open on your wherever you're watching
Speaker 1: the show, whether it be on YouTube or Facebook or wherever.
Speaker 1: We're even on Rumble. Believe it or not, Todd, I
Speaker 1: actually stream the show to Rumble. I know that that's
Speaker 1: that might might not be the most receptive audience, but
Speaker 1: but that's part of why I like to stream the
Speaker 1: show there and on LinkedIn as well. So yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: so I try to try to make it as available
Speaker 1: as possible or perhaps unavoidable would be a better way
Speaker 1: of putting it.
Speaker 2: But well, what's great about you always that I really
Speaker 2: do appreciate and I'm sure share Sara would share these sentiments.
Speaker 2: You're really about equity and trying to keep a balance
Speaker 2: and letting everyone kind of have a voice. Yeah, so,
Speaker 2: I you know, I think it's important, Like, look, we're
Speaker 2: not going to fix the things that are happening in
Speaker 2: this country just remaining in an echo chamber and not
Speaker 2: listening to the other viable sides. Yeah, and not basically
Speaker 2: offering anybody that is pro democracy a seat at the table.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think it's important to to, you know, be
Speaker 1: very much open to that. So thank you for that.
Speaker 1: And Sarah is in the chat room and says, appreciate
Speaker 1: Todd speaking for me today while my voice is m
Speaker 1: I A. I love my team, Thank you, Sarah.
Speaker 2: This is this is this is kind of reversal. Right,
Speaker 2: my voice was the one that was challenged for god
Speaker 2: knows how long.
Speaker 1: So we should talk about you and again, listeners of
Speaker 1: the Hanging Left podcast obviously are already very familiar with you, Todd.
Speaker 1: But for for people who are not familiar with that
Speaker 1: show who might not know you, what is what is
Speaker 1: your role in the campaign and and how did you
Speaker 1: how did this come about? Where where you're working with Sarah?
Speaker 2: Sure, Matt, No, that's a good question. So basically I
Speaker 2: am her political director. Not basically I am her political director.
Speaker 2: So what that kind of means is it's kind of
Speaker 2: taken on, you know, it's an organic position, so it
Speaker 2: kind of takes on things that they need it. But
Speaker 2: within the field area anyway, I'm her right hand person.
Speaker 2: Also I helped manage the field team and ultimately will
Speaker 2: help her manage with the field team as sorry as
Speaker 2: the field team, we will all help manage the hopefully
Speaker 2: the army of volunteers that we acquire. Hopefully, though, I
Speaker 2: mean a lot of people seem to already be interested.
Speaker 2: It's just a matter of getting that aspect of the
Speaker 2: campaign up and running.
Speaker 1: So as you do this, uh, what what are you
Speaker 1: seeing out there on the on the campaign trail? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, when when you're able to obviously you know,
Speaker 1: cold and flu season has already started. But but but
Speaker 1: thatt aside, I mean what and by the way, this
Speaker 1: might this might contribute to people being sick because obviously
Speaker 1: campaigning is hard work, right for sure, probably nobody, nobody
Speaker 1: involved in this endeavor, including Sarah herself. I'm sure is
Speaker 1: is getting enough rest and that's that just comes with it, right,
Speaker 1: But but it's also worth it, of course to make
Speaker 1: that sacrifice. But but what's it been like so far?
Speaker 2: I mean, it's it's it's it's a lot of work, absolutely,
Speaker 2: And why I you know, am definitely focused on this
Speaker 2: is because I guess I feel like, you know, all
Speaker 2: of us have roles to play really in the world
Speaker 2: in general. But I think that if you've been given
Speaker 2: a gift, whether that's the gift of the ability to speak,
Speaker 2: the ability to create coalitions and to help mobilize people,
Speaker 2: and you've been given and you have charisma, and you
Speaker 2: have the and also you happen to have contacts and
Speaker 2: the ears of people that very few people have, the
Speaker 2: ears of I almost think it's it's imperative and you're
Speaker 2: compelled to do what it takes in this moment to
Speaker 2: do what you can to protect this country. I mean,
Speaker 2: I would almost feel guilty if I hadn't joined the campaign.
Speaker 2: And the thing about Sarah is that we have the
Speaker 2: same philosophy, right, and that's that basically we understand the
Speaker 2: importance of having a universal vision which sort of takes
Speaker 2: into account the people as well as the establishment as
Speaker 2: well as like the you know, both the the very
Speaker 2: left side of the establishment all the way to the
Speaker 2: more center side and even you know, some more pragmatic
Speaker 2: conservatives and hold more of like ideally like like a
Speaker 2: the conversation circle and and you know gets you know,
Speaker 2: sometimes literally, sometimes figuratively, but just be out there and
Speaker 2: open and let people know that, you know, to me,
Speaker 2: I don't know. I couldn't really do anything else in
Speaker 2: the moment. Honestly, I think that like I do happen,
Speaker 2: oh and so to I guess take a deeper dive
Speaker 2: into that. Myself, my colleague Jason who's her scheduler, as
Speaker 2: well as a member of the field staff, and then
Speaker 2: Andrew who is also field staff and our photographer as
Speaker 2: well as now myself and Andrew are now running the
Speaker 2: social media part of it. You know, all of us
Speaker 2: and even Sarah herself, we come from an activism world.
Speaker 2: We come from a activist world. We come from a
Speaker 2: nonprofit world. We come from you know, amongst the people,
Speaker 2: but some of us, and specifically myself and Sarah, we
Speaker 2: also have been lucky enough and have the privilege of
Speaker 2: knowing some people that call the shots. So I think
Speaker 2: that what the people want right now is people that
Speaker 2: are fighting for them and are having an honest conversation
Speaker 2: with the people and the establishment and not shunning them
Speaker 2: and not beating them up, because I don't think that's
Speaker 2: going to get us anywhere, but definitely holding them to
Speaker 2: accountability and saying you know, good enough isn't good enough,
Speaker 2: and especially when you know the threats we're facing right
Speaker 2: now are internal and serious and this is not time
Speaker 2: to like, you know, take your foot off the pedal.
Speaker 2: I mean, you really got to hit it hard.
Speaker 1: Well, how hard is that to navigate? I mean maybe
Speaker 1: this is getting a little inside baseball, but but like you,
Speaker 1: like you said, I mean as far as because yeah,
Speaker 1: you kind of have to fight. It's almost like in
Speaker 1: my mind, and again I'm speaking from the perspective of
Speaker 1: I've only ever had a lot of opinions and done
Speaker 1: a lot of bloviating and commenting on politics. I've never
Speaker 1: worked for a campaign. I've certainly never run for office.
Speaker 1: So I'm very much asking this question from the outside
Speaker 1: because I am on the outside in that sense. But
Speaker 1: you're you kind of it's almost like if this were
Speaker 1: a war, you'd be fighting on two fronts, right, because
Speaker 1: you've got ultimately, you know, you're you're fighting for democracy, right,
Speaker 1: and you're you're fighting against the fascism that we're seeing
Speaker 1: in all of that, right. So so you've got that fight.
Speaker 1: But before you even get to that fight, you've also
Speaker 1: got the fight of how do you break through when
Speaker 1: the establishment of the Democratic Party has such a hold
Speaker 1: on everything you know, and they you know, everyone loves
Speaker 1: an underdog, except for those who are directly threatened by
Speaker 1: the underdog.
Speaker 2: Right, although you know, that's an interesting point you bring up,
Speaker 2: and I think that there's a little bit of a
Speaker 2: confusion there. You know, it's it's not the time for
Speaker 2: us to be divided, and so I think that because
Speaker 2: some of us are I guess lucky or maybe unlucky
Speaker 2: depending on your perspective to have the ears of both
Speaker 2: the centrist establishment as well as the very left progressive.
Speaker 2: You know, that allows us to rally the people, but honestly,
Speaker 2: we're not. I don't see it as like fighting two fronts.
Speaker 2: I see it as giving people permission to stand up.
Speaker 2: And Sarah sees it the same way. I mean, people
Speaker 2: are just afraid. They're not they're not not wanting to fight. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I mean there's that people don't know how to People
Speaker 2: don't know what works and what doesn't work. And if
Speaker 2: you're a member of the establishment, and I can only
Speaker 2: speak I think to the New Hampshire establishment, but if
Speaker 2: you're a member of that establishment, I think we all
Speaker 2: like no one in New Hampshire. As as Papas said
Speaker 2: very recently in a speech, we are not a pro
Speaker 2: dictator state. No, I mean the whole Live for or
Speaker 2: Die is all about independence. So yeah, right, so you
Speaker 2: can grab that fire for independence and which just segues
Speaker 2: very nicely into democracy and and get everybody on the
Speaker 2: same page, because like, you know, yes, okay, there's the
Speaker 2: Democrats of the Republicans, but there's also the big D,
Speaker 2: which is democracy, and that's what we're all fighting for
Speaker 2: against the other big D, which is dictatorship. You know,
Speaker 2: that's what we're fighting against. And most people that you know, look,
Speaker 2: only about thirty percent of this population. And that's so
Speaker 2: thirty percent will follow him, I would say, once it's
Speaker 2: all said and done, and then within that thirty percent,
Speaker 2: conservatively fifteen percent but probably closer to like five percent
Speaker 2: would benefit from this power grab. You know, a vast
Speaker 2: majority of even the people following him, he's just lying
Speaker 2: to them and feeding them their breads and circuses. But
Speaker 2: the end of the day, his plan is you know,
Speaker 2: their disposal too to him. Oh so it's just important,
Speaker 2: you know, Look, we can't flip everyone, right, And it's
Speaker 2: really it's it's kind of like this. This is how
Speaker 2: I look at it, and I think it's how Sarah
Speaker 2: would probably say it too. It just so happens. The
Speaker 2: Democratic Party right now is the party that's standing up
Speaker 2: for people. But we support everyone that stands up for people.
Speaker 2: So at the end of the day, we you know,
Speaker 2: we welcome open dialogue and a little bit of you know,
Speaker 2: descent amongst each other in a positive, healthy way. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's what democracies about.
Speaker 1: Sarah did stay in the chow room. It's not the
Speaker 1: time to be divided either. We are all in this together.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I think matt were very lucky because
Speaker 2: New England and definitely New Hampshire it's one of those
Speaker 2: places that you know, for the longest time prior to
Speaker 2: pre Maga, I grew up my whole life not knowing
Speaker 2: people as Democrat or Republican or independent. I mean most
Speaker 2: people actually call themselves independent. And it wasn't a dirty
Speaker 2: word either because it didn't necessarily mean like this quase
Speaker 2: like hiding of like libertarian, which was a quase hiding
Speaker 2: of mega. It wasn't at.
Speaker 1: All, especially especially in New Hampshire by the way, as
Speaker 1: an unusually high number of duties.
Speaker 2: I mean, people were generally independent and people were generally
Speaker 2: not wanting to get involved in people's personal business, you know.
Speaker 2: I mean the arguments typically were just like some variations
Speaker 2: on fiscal responsibility and that kind of thing, and where
Speaker 2: do we spend the money? Where don't we spend the money?
Speaker 2: But you know, I'd never met anyone prior to this
Speaker 2: current situation that wanted to tear everything down and burn
Speaker 2: it all down and have some sort of like you know,
Speaker 2: sci Fi dictatorship going right right.
Speaker 1: By the way, Jenny is also in the chat room
Speaker 1: and says, hello, Hi, Jenny, how are you. She wanted
Speaker 1: to be with us, but she's also taking a break.
Speaker 1: So okay, yeah, we all need you know, we all
Speaker 1: need uh, we all need to unplug sometimes, right, We
Speaker 1: gotta yet to think think about think about our health,
Speaker 1: which I don't always you know, I also am am
Speaker 1: a victim to uh, you know, thinking I'm Superman and.
Speaker 2: Oh myself included. You know, it's difficult right now because
Speaker 2: Sarah is basically asked to be in some respects, She's
Speaker 2: asked a kind of It's like a human being asked
Speaker 2: to play Wonder Woman, just like maybe we're people trying
Speaker 2: to be Superman. But you're right, the realities were not superheroes.
Speaker 2: We don't have superpowers, and so we got to do
Speaker 2: what we got to do.
Speaker 1: Right, right exactly. So what are you hearing, you know,
Speaker 1: out on the campaign trail, like, what are you what
Speaker 1: are you hearing from?
Speaker 2: This? Actually pretty pleasantly surprising. I mean, I think most
Speaker 2: people so it's a good time to be outside the
Speaker 2: system and it's a good time to be I would
Speaker 2: say a little more progressive of center like like center
Speaker 2: like still understand. I would call it a pragmatic progressive
Speaker 2: because you know, progress in the sense that a lowercase
Speaker 2: P progress where you support change and you support moving
Speaker 2: forward and you support so not a radicalized definition of
Speaker 2: progressive like you know, the alt right has tried to
Speaker 2: mark the Democratic Party with progressive right as in the
Speaker 2: but it's not. It's about change, right, so you know.
Speaker 2: But at the end of the day, who really it
Speaker 2: doesn't again, it doesn't matter and there will be some
Speaker 2: some differences absolutely, but you know, the Democratic Party is
Speaker 2: a big tent party and there is room for everyone. Uh.
Speaker 2: The only I would say non negotiable is democracy. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's just not negotiable, well said uh.
Speaker 1: Sarah also said can't save the world if you don't
Speaker 1: get any sleep. We're a team for a reason. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's true.
Speaker 2: Although very true.
Speaker 1: Although my my caffeine addiction might disagree. But yeah, but
Speaker 1: my caffeine addiction might kill me eventually. I don't know.
Speaker 2: But sometimes you're just for you know, let me tell
Speaker 2: you from someone that knows, like, you know, look at
Speaker 2: you know the last time I was doing that whole
Speaker 2: voice thing. Yeah, I got my if I've got my
Speaker 2: button gear and got tested for you know, strap and
Speaker 2: treated it right away. Yeah, I would have had a
Speaker 2: voice a lot sooner. Right, Sometimes you have to give in,
Speaker 2: you know, as much as you don't want to.
Speaker 1: That is that, That is absolutely true. Absolutely none of.
Speaker 2: Us are good at fifty percent, right, Like, this is
Speaker 2: not a fifty percent level fight, So were better to say,
Speaker 2: you know what, we can't give one hundred percent or
Speaker 2: even seventy five percent right now, So we're going to
Speaker 2: have to unplug for a few even for a few days, yeah,
Speaker 2: because then we can come back in one hundred percent again.
Speaker 1: Right, right? Do you you know do you want to
Speaker 1: talk about specific Uh oh, actually, let me read this comment.
Speaker 1: Sarah made another comment and then this this might be
Speaker 1: a good jumping off point for what I was about
Speaker 1: to ask as a matter of fact, she said, we're
Speaker 1: hearing a lot of people that want policy that actually
Speaker 1: makes sense. We want change, but not this change. People
Speaker 1: are concerned and ready to step into help how they can.
Speaker 1: So I was and I was about to ask you
Speaker 1: about about policy as a matter of fact.
Speaker 2: So, yeah, I think this is the one thing I
Speaker 2: think also that's helping bring us all together. Whether you
Speaker 2: talk to Pappus, good Lander, Sarah, even some of our
Speaker 2: opponents in this race. You know, I would say the
Speaker 2: key word is affordability, and then that is literally partnered
Speaker 2: in parallel to human rights. So even if you have
Speaker 2: a very socially conscious focus or you have a very
Speaker 2: economically focused the two cannot exist in a vacuum. They
Speaker 2: both need each other. So lack of affordability means lack
Speaker 2: of human rights, and lack of human rights means people
Speaker 2: don't get the same level of resources and access to resources.
Speaker 1: Well, there's the three basic needs, right, and then there's
Speaker 1: a hierarchy of needs which is a little deeper about
Speaker 1: the three basic needs, food, clothing, and shelter. So you know,
Speaker 1: if people can't afford food, and they can't afford clothing
Speaker 1: and they can't afford housing, then yeah, then then they
Speaker 1: don't have they don't have rights and you know, basic
Speaker 1: human rights and dignity and all of that right.
Speaker 2: And so here's our goal. Our goal is to basically
Speaker 2: at least meet that baseline and make sure they can
Speaker 2: have all of those things right and they our rights,
Speaker 2: not privileges. And then once we do that, then we
Speaker 2: can go in and really start to like you know,
Speaker 2: organically grow the United States and the democracy that we want.
Speaker 2: And there's going to be some exchange of ideas and
Speaker 2: there's going to be some arguments, and there's going to
Speaker 2: be you know, a level of compromise. But compromise until
Speaker 2: this whole situation was not necessarily dirty word. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, it's almost the necessity.
Speaker 1: Now in terms of in terms of policy. And you know,
Speaker 1: you use out that word a very important word, affordability,
Speaker 1: which is something that people are very concerned about. I
Speaker 1: don't know, like, I don't know how into the weeds
Speaker 1: you want to get, because I want to know. I
Speaker 1: want to well, I want to know more, but I
Speaker 1: also I want to be conscious of I'm sure you
Speaker 1: don't want to get out too far ahead of Sarah
Speaker 1: and shall say about anything. So I want to know,
Speaker 1: but I also understand and respect that you know, there's
Speaker 1: only so far you can go as far as specific policy. Sure,
Speaker 1: but here's what you can tell us.
Speaker 2: But the other interesting thing about this, Matt, is that
Speaker 2: like our policies, I don't know how the other campaigns
Speaker 2: are doing it. But even our policies we do in
Speaker 2: like a you know, a forum type environment. So typically
Speaker 2: what we do, it's it's primarily I would say myself
Speaker 2: and Jason and then also her consultant Anthony, we kind
Speaker 2: of craft what we think are are good policies for
Speaker 2: you know, that makes sense that and then also are
Speaker 2: winning policies, you know, and then she will go through
Speaker 2: it and she will make sure that it's you know,
Speaker 2: sarahfied like it works for Sarah right, which is important.
Speaker 2: I mean, authenticity is super important. So I don't know,
Speaker 2: do that answer your question? So I guess back in
Speaker 2: the whole thing, what do you want to know exactly
Speaker 2: about the like what policies or what would.
Speaker 1: You Well, so when we're talking about affordability, like what
Speaker 1: are what are what are some of the ideas because
Speaker 1: obviously affordable when we say affordability. You know, we we
Speaker 1: mean we're talking about inflation, we're talking about housing, which
Speaker 1: you know is part of inflation, but obviously that there's
Speaker 1: also separate issues with housing. I mean, are are we
Speaker 1: talking about I heard an idea floated recently that I
Speaker 1: would support, you know, banning private equity, for example, from
Speaker 1: buying residential housing. I don't know, I mean, are are
Speaker 1: there things like that? I mean, any anything in you
Speaker 1: can give us?
Speaker 2: So yeah, yeah, absolutely for sure. So I don't know
Speaker 2: her her stand exactly on the private equity equity side
Speaker 2: of things. I do know that we support, you know,
Speaker 2: a universal health care system. I do know that we
Speaker 2: support fair and equitable housing. The keyword of equity versus
Speaker 2: the quality, meaning everything is brought up to a baseline
Speaker 2: that works for everyone where they're at. So meeting people
Speaker 2: where they're as opposed to like this, no matter what
Speaker 2: the formula is, there isn't one size fit's all right,
Speaker 2: So you have to be open to adaptive policies and
Speaker 2: policies that kind of which is what makes doing policies
Speaker 2: so challenging.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's one of the things that And again
Speaker 1: speaking as an outsider who's never been involved in a campaign.
Speaker 1: I would imagine that that's one of the most challenging
Speaker 1: parts because you have to you have to craft policy
Speaker 1: that makes sense, that addresses the problems, but also that
Speaker 1: can be communicated and articulated to the to the voters
Speaker 1: or prospective voters, and then if you win policy that
Speaker 1: you can follow through on because you'll be held to
Speaker 1: count the next time you run. So I would imagine
Speaker 1: that that's one of the most absolutely, one of the
Speaker 1: most challenging parts of this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think so, although I think that it's there's
Speaker 2: an interesting situation going on here, that's it what people
Speaker 2: don't realize, And I think we didn't realize this. I mean,
Speaker 2: I happened to have worked for the directly for the
Speaker 2: Harris campaign, and I think, sorry, hold on, yeah, no
Speaker 2: worries one of the biggest mistakes that we made. And
Speaker 2: that's why I now work with a actual campaign and
Speaker 2: not for the DNC directly, because there's a lot more
Speaker 2: autonomy and a lot more ability to like be yourself.
Speaker 2: But anyway, so I'd rather work with establishment rather than
Speaker 2: be part of the establishment. Sure, sure, but anyway, what
Speaker 2: was he saying? Oh, so, I think it's kind of
Speaker 2: going back to your analogy of Maslow's higherarchy of needs, right,
Speaker 2: I think it's unfair to ask people that haven't reached
Speaker 2: levels one and two, which is you know, subsistence slash
Speaker 2: baseline survival and then just living to then sit and
Speaker 2: pontificate about these higher level things that myself and say
Speaker 2: our own Jason and all the rest of us political
Speaker 2: junkies talk about. Right. And it's also sort of silly
Speaker 2: and kind of naive to think that we can convince
Speaker 2: people on these like abstract, sort of like idealistic things
Speaker 2: to support us. But but the but the other side
Speaker 2: of that coin is that if you give people those
Speaker 2: things and you raise their baseline, ay, they're more open
Speaker 2: to social progressive change and be they're not threatened by
Speaker 2: it because you're not saying we're gonna take this away
Speaker 2: to do this, right, You're providing them a good baseline
Speaker 2: and we're we're we want more than basics. And that's
Speaker 2: the other problem too. I mean, up to this point,
Speaker 2: I think a lot of people, certainly the current leadership,
Speaker 2: certain current administration, they're giving people just like baseline survival
Speaker 2: or a little bit better. It's like baseline survival with
Speaker 2: a package that looks a little nicer, but the day
Speaker 2: it's just gilded and it really is just baseline survival,
Speaker 2: you know. In that way, we like to look at
Speaker 2: like some European models and things like that, where people,
Speaker 2: you know, actually there their basic needs, they're met and
Speaker 2: then even some of their wants, right Like, you know,
Speaker 2: it's it's not about oh my god, like we can
Speaker 2: get by, It's about we all deserve a quality of living.
Speaker 1: Right right. Uh. Sarah commented in the chat room to again,
Speaker 1: regarding policy, we are working with community leaders to put
Speaker 1: together policy that's not pie in the sky, things that
Speaker 1: actually makes sense and can be put into action to
Speaker 1: make a difference.
Speaker 2: Yeah. That that's a good point that she brings up,
Speaker 2: and I'm sorry I should have remembered that too as well. Yeah,
Speaker 2: how we're formulating our policy is sitting down with the experts.
Speaker 2: So like I'm not going to sit down, and Sarah's
Speaker 2: not going to sit down, although she happens to be
Speaker 2: in education, so maybe that's not a great example. Well,
Speaker 2: let's say, like the current CALF and Human Services secretary,
Speaker 2: we're not about to go tell doctors how they should
Speaker 2: be handling a pandemic, right or like, we're not going
Speaker 2: to write policies that ignore medical and scientific evidence. We're
Speaker 2: going to listen to the experts. We're going to look
Speaker 2: at the studies, and then we're going to base policies
Speaker 2: on those things.
Speaker 1: Right now, that that makes sense.
Speaker 2: You know? And if we're making policies about changing and
Speaker 2: getting police and policing in a better place, then we're
Speaker 2: going to talk to both sides. We're going to talk
Speaker 2: to this to the people and the communities that feel
Speaker 2: over policed or whatever it is and they feel like
Speaker 2: there's a police biased and the police activists. But we're
Speaker 2: also going to talk to the police themselves and ask them, like,
Speaker 2: you know, how can we build a bridge? See, it's
Speaker 2: really all about building bridges. It's not about like like
Speaker 2: let's pick one side and really run hard at that
Speaker 2: one side.
Speaker 1: Right right?
Speaker 2: Does that make sense? No?
Speaker 1: It does? It does. What is is there anything that's
Speaker 1: really surprised you again, in terms of being out on
Speaker 1: the campaign trail and talking to people, Anything that that
Speaker 1: maybe people are concerned with that you didn't expect, or
Speaker 1: maybe that you didn't expect quite so much, or oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: go ahead.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I'll be honest I mean, as far
Speaker 2: as Maslows hierarchy of needs go, I've been very lucky,
Speaker 2: and I've been around a lot of people that are
Speaker 2: very lucky and frankly relatively privileged to live in that
Speaker 2: like third rum. So I can sit around and self
Speaker 2: actualize and I can think about the big picture, macro
Speaker 2: ways to make the world a better place. And what
Speaker 2: shocked me is that because I have come from the
Speaker 2: environment that I've come from, even young people around me
Speaker 2: live still relatively privileged you know, life lives, so they
Speaker 2: were able to sort of like, then we're you're able
Speaker 2: to sort of save the world when all your basic
Speaker 2: needs are met and then more than met, you know,
Speaker 2: like right. So I think I think it's it's really
Speaker 2: getting that pragmatism down that even amongst the activists there
Speaker 2: still is a root line in act in in pragmatism.
Speaker 2: But then again, it's actually not shocking because then when
Speaker 2: you talk to the older, more established people, they tend
Speaker 2: to fall or not even ai the older, but people
Speaker 2: are just more established and more comfortable, then they do
Speaker 2: tend to go to the save democracy side. So I
Speaker 2: think the thing that's very interesting is that I think
Speaker 2: a like a bilateral message or a multi lateral message,
Speaker 2: A multim you know, directional message is so much more
Speaker 2: effective and more realistic than certainly that a singular message.
Speaker 2: So you know, it's looking at all those variables. But
Speaker 2: it's also what I love is there's this little game
Speaker 2: out there. It's like, you know, I like to say
Speaker 2: green is very green, you know, because I'm very environmental, right,
Speaker 2: But rather than it and argue, you know, until you're
Speaker 2: out of breath about saving the whales, which is important,
Speaker 2: there's actually arguments out there as to how saving the
Speaker 2: whales creates this whole like biodiversity and biosystem within the
Speaker 2: ocean that supports the food chains that supports like like
Speaker 2: ocean agricul like all this amazing stuff. Yeah, we're so
Speaker 2: much more interconnected even with other species than we think
Speaker 2: we are, right, absolutely, and I think that's so important.
Speaker 2: So we can almost create the same eco system within politics.
Speaker 2: I mean, we can have a like a multi ecosystem,
Speaker 2: and I think that that's something Sarah really seems to
Speaker 2: support too, is this idea. I mean, she works in
Speaker 2: defense and she works in international relations, so you absolutely
Speaker 2: are going to be talking to some Republicans And although
Speaker 2: the maga people would like us to feel like, you know,
Speaker 2: and when I mean the mag of people, I mean
Speaker 2: specifically the the mad King and his his his nutty
Speaker 2: court gesters, you know, the administration itself, not that not
Speaker 2: even necessarily all the people that even voted for him,
Speaker 2: because of course that's not the case. But these you know,
Speaker 2: they they don't understand that it's really not this this
Speaker 2: voice that he's it's not the narrative he's spinning. Like
Speaker 2: we're a lot more like than we think. Most people
Speaker 2: want the same things, and most people will actually go
Speaker 2: for it if you tell them that's what you're gonna
Speaker 2: fight for.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he he spends it. Uh, the mad King as
Speaker 1: you refer to him as, uh, you know, from all.
Speaker 2: He's kind of mad. I mean, this is all this is,
Speaker 2: this is nuts.
Speaker 1: Yeah. He puts everything, you know, from a presentative, from
Speaker 1: a position of division and and and fear, very fear.
Speaker 1: You know that the immigrants are taking you know, the
Speaker 1: migrants are taking all your jobs and all that kind
Speaker 1: of stuff, and you know, just you know.
Speaker 2: It's also very verbose, and it's very like out of
Speaker 2: like like out of the world, out of worldliness. It's
Speaker 2: like he wants to create this like this echo chamber
Speaker 2: that is like, you know, the apocalypse, almost like he's
Speaker 2: rescuing us from the apocalypse, which is not what he's
Speaker 2: doing at all, If anything, he's But here's the good news.
Speaker 2: He's a lot more and his administration is a lot
Speaker 2: more fragmented and a lot more disjointed than people think.
Speaker 2: I mean, the most power people have or the most
Speaker 2: powerful people, and their biggest weapon is convincing you they
Speaker 2: have a lot of power. So you realize that they
Speaker 2: don't have as much power as we think they do.
Speaker 2: You're disarming them right there.
Speaker 1: Well, he did say only he can how did he
Speaker 1: put it? I don't know, only he can do it
Speaker 1: or only he can say. Well, here's the thing.
Speaker 2: The problem with that mindset is even people amongst his
Speaker 2: leadership don't agree with that now and they're starting to
Speaker 2: voice that. So he's got a power grab within his
Speaker 2: power structure. That's never good.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, so we can now.
Speaker 2: Win by actually unifying and then just like exposing and
Speaker 2: not even exposing them as individuals and their characters because
Speaker 2: everybody knows it's buffoonery, like we're gonna not get you
Speaker 2: where by constantly saying, you know, Trump's a clown. Hences
Speaker 2: the clown, they're all pre you know, that's not going
Speaker 2: to how we're going to win votes. We're gonna win
Speaker 2: votes by saying, look, you know, this is what he's
Speaker 2: doing to you know, immigrant populations. This is how it's
Speaker 2: affecting red and blue states in the areas of agriculture
Speaker 2: and the building into
Podbean