Field Dispatch
LiveNation and Ticketmaster must be split | Matt Connarton Unleashed
Speaker 1: We love music industry news on the show.
Speaker 2: This is from Digitalmusicnews dot com, one of my favorite
Speaker 2: websites for music industry news, and you know we someone
Speaker 2: even commented me about it recently. You know, you guys,
Speaker 2: you beat up Live Nation and Ticketmaster quite a bit
Speaker 2: on the show. Well, they are giants, or they are
Speaker 2: a giant because it really is all one company.
Speaker 1: It is a monopoly.
Speaker 2: They can take it, they can take us throwing shots
Speaker 2: at them, but there is now they are being threatened
Speaker 2: with being forced to break up. Dozens of state Attorneys
Speaker 2: general around the country are now demanding that Live Nation
Speaker 2: and Ticketmaster that this merger when did they merge?
Speaker 1: I mean it had to be at least a decade ago.
Speaker 2: Right, that this merger be undone after all this time,
Speaker 2: and that they be split up because they are simply
Speaker 2: too powerful, too much of a monopoly. And I'll tell
Speaker 2: you a lot of people in the music industry would
Speaker 2: really applaud that would love to see Live Nation and
Speaker 2: Ticketmaster finally being separated. But this is the article from
Speaker 2: Digital Musicnews dot com. Live Nation and Ticketmaster must be separated,
Speaker 2: say dozen of US state AG's demand in stepped up
Speaker 2: court filings so this is what's happening a group of
Speaker 2: state attorneys general.
Speaker 1: And by the way, it is the plural.
Speaker 2: And I'm glad they got it right in the article
Speaker 2: because I hear a lot of people get this wrong.
Speaker 2: I even hear journalists who should no better get this wrong.
Speaker 2: The plural of attorney general is not attorney generals. I
Speaker 2: hear people get that wrong all the time. The plural
Speaker 2: of attorney general is attorneys general. They're not generals, So
Speaker 2: it's not attorney generals. They don't serve in the military.
Speaker 2: They are attorneys and general as in a general attorney,
Speaker 2: serving the you know, representing the community that for whom
Speaker 2: they've been elected to represent, whether it be a state
Speaker 2: attorney general or the United States attorney general, they are
Speaker 2: attorneys general. That is the plural. I'm very much a
Speaker 2: stickler for that kind of thing hinge. Every time I hear,
Speaker 2: you know, some politicians say attorney generals, it's like, no,
Speaker 2: that's wrong, and you sound dumb. Okay, anyway, Sorry, I'm
Speaker 2: very judgmental when it comes to that. On Thursday, May
Speaker 2: twenty first, the coalition of over thirty state attorneys general
Speaker 2: that sued a Live Nation and Ticketmaster in a trial
Speaker 2: that found the Live Events Gianing to be in violation
Speaker 2: of antitrust law, has demanded that Live Nations sell ticket Master.
Speaker 2: The States laid out their proposal in a much anticipated
Speaker 2: legal brief, asserting that the only way to fix the
Speaker 2: live music business is to force the companies to split it.
Speaker 1: Says here okay.
Speaker 2: The States wrote in their filing quote in order requiring
Speaker 2: Live Nation to divest Ticketmaster such that is capable of
Speaker 2: restoring competition for primary ticketing contracts with major concert venues.
Speaker 2: Plaintiffs are evaluating the scope of assets, contras VX, personnel,
Speaker 2: and systems that would be necessary for a standalone ticketmaster
Speaker 2: to effectively compete in the market for primary ticketing services
Speaker 2: to major concert venues unquote. The States are also requesting
Speaker 2: that Live Nation be forced to divest a sufficient number
Speaker 2: of amphitheaters and face restrictions on acquiring new ones. Further,
Speaker 2: they demand monetary damages for a quote overcharges on ticketing
Speaker 2: fees paid by residents of the plaintiff states unquote, as
Speaker 2: well as the handover of quote ill gotten profits derived
Speaker 2: from ticketing fees during the time of the unlawful monopoly unquote.
Speaker 2: Live Nation for their part, will be filing formal motions
Speaker 2: and opposition in the coming weeks. The company is likely
Speaker 2: to argue that the case can be resolved simply by
Speaker 2: changes to its business practices which were previously agreed upon
Speaker 2: with the Department of Justice, such as limiting its use
Speaker 2: of exclusive contracts. Dozens of states and the DOJ sued
Speaker 2: Live Nation in twenty twenty four are alleging that the company,
Speaker 2: which which acquired Ticketmaster in an approved merger in twenty ten. Okay,
Speaker 2: so even longer than I thought. I said, what ten
Speaker 2: years ago? They actually merged back in twenty ten, So
Speaker 2: sixteen years ago. That this had grown into a monopoly
Speaker 2: that has dominated the live music industry for years, to
Speaker 2: put it mildly, But just a week after the case
Speaker 2: went to trial, the DOJ agreed to a sweetheart deal,
Speaker 2: blind siding the court. However, the States seemed the deal
Speaker 2: insufficient and not in the public interest, and pushed ahead
Speaker 2: with the trial, asserting that the breakup of the two
Speaker 2: companies was the best path forward. On April fifteen, the
Speaker 2: jury found that Live Nation and Ticketmaster had operated a
Speaker 2: monopoly dominating the market for ticketing services and the use
Speaker 2: of amphitheaters and illegally trying to use i'm sorry, illegally
Speaker 2: tying the use of its venues to its promotion services.
Speaker 2: So and again we've talked about that on the show.
Speaker 2: That's the end of that article, but we've talked about
Speaker 2: that last part on the show. You know, when you
Speaker 2: when you try to induce someone into doing a particular
Speaker 2: type of business with you, or maybe they're already doing
Speaker 2: that business with you, but you're trying to get them
Speaker 2: to shut up and stop complaining about it. You might say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, if you cease to do business with us
Speaker 2: in this modality, we might also stop doing business with
Speaker 2: you in this other thing.
Speaker 1: You know. So if you're a company that maybe you own.
Speaker 2: Multiple venues and you want to sever your your relationship
Speaker 2: with Tickemaster in terms of servicing a particular venue, well
Speaker 2: they might say, okay, well, then we're also going to
Speaker 2: service our relationship with you with these other venues that
Speaker 2: you definitely definitely need us for.
Speaker 1: Is that illegal?
Speaker 2: Is that predatory a predatory business practice? Or is that
Speaker 2: just playing hardball? Is that just being tough?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 2: I don't know where the line is. We've talked about
Speaker 2: that on the show before. But these state attorneys general,
Speaker 2: they seem to have an idea of where the line is,
Speaker 2: and they're now aggressively once again going after Live Nation
Speaker 2: and Ticketmaster. I don't know if these dozens of US filings,
Speaker 2: US state filings, I don't know if these are going
Speaker 2: to amount to anything in the end.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: It's not the federal government this time going after them
Speaker 2: in this instance, although the federal government does go after
Speaker 2: Live Nation for other things. This is I mean, the
Speaker 2: DOJ has suited Live Nation more than once. This is
Speaker 2: individual state ags going after Ticketmaster and Live Nation and
Speaker 2: saying they must be separated they are too powerful of
Speaker 2: a monopoly.
Podbean