Field Dispatch
Matt Connarton Unleashed 6-20-26 hour 3
Speaker 1: You are listening to WM ANDH.
Speaker 2: World premiere.
Speaker 1: Right now on wm n H ninety five point three FM.
Speaker 1: Matt Connorton Unleashed presents the exclusive world radio premiere of
Speaker 1: the new single from Flock, coming out June twenty four,
Speaker 1: But you heard it here first. This is called stop Turning.
Speaker 3: Howson inside and I can't find these said sell you
Speaker 3: Andy suit.
Speaker 2: So a pursuit no fan sing, But I couldn't escape
Speaker 2: do I can't sing a little way? Ho ho? I
Speaker 2: can sing a little way?
Speaker 3: Hey ho? Ho?
Speaker 2: I canna real sky you steal you see us?
Speaker 1: So meet to go? I try to lesi who else saything.
Speaker 2: So farway from me?
Speaker 4: When I need to holl the side eye?
Speaker 3: Ho?
Speaker 1: Ho?
Speaker 4: Should I need to hold the side? I?
Speaker 3: Ho?
Speaker 4: Ho?
Speaker 2: Who keep brunning? I'll keep what's you.
Speaker 4: And one sign style souning, I'll sty loving you.
Speaker 2: Love Love love whens chee running cheep, whats.
Speaker 4: Tin sign save sunning all style love twens change running
Speaker 4: chee whats Collen sign stave sunning all sound Love.
Speaker 1: It now another exclusive world radio premiere. You heard it
Speaker 1: here first on w m n H ninety five point
Speaker 1: three FM. Courtesy of Matt Connerton Unleashed, coming out June
Speaker 1: twenty sixth, the new single from Idle Hive, Blood in
Speaker 1: My Margarita.
Speaker 3: She came in out of wrong way saster, She told
Speaker 3: me her I haven't been so defficult.
Speaker 2: It's that impossible, just a passing, so she said, alive's
Speaker 2: never been so nsy.
Speaker 3: But dissappeared out a pinch out Fendi.
Speaker 2: You just at tackle a lot. This spends on game
Speaker 2: so long. Then the short stuff went up in small cash.
Speaker 3: She lost me under the cold shape had all that
Speaker 3: givey was?
Speaker 2: She said?
Speaker 3: And now this blood and my bargar reader, now this
Speaker 3: blood in my Bagaria.
Speaker 2: What's I aroused by the fake conflesh?
Speaker 3: Lot?
Speaker 2: Why thinking our fence.
Speaker 1: Brind or Darling.
Speaker 2: Don't you know you clean her in my good She
Speaker 2: set her face wasn't pure Refletcher be find a mirror.
Speaker 1: In the matter, have an instant or he mince me.
Speaker 2: She sees herbody lost time. Please. Then the short stuff
Speaker 2: went up be small cash.
Speaker 3: She lost me under the cour save no man.
Speaker 2: He was shape.
Speaker 3: Thenlle blood and my Margaritada. Thenwe blude in my margaarder.
Speaker 3: They're shut stuff when not.
Speaker 2: Baseball, And I last under the coach beyond normand g
Speaker 2: he was.
Speaker 3: And now that bood and my margar reader now this
Speaker 3: bird and my margar reader.
Speaker 2: The nowther brd and my Margaritada node and my Margaritader.
Speaker 1: You're listening to Matt Connorton Unleashed on w m and
Speaker 1: H ninety five point three. Welcome everybody. We have entered
Speaker 1: our number three new marrow trace of Matt Connorton Unleashed
Speaker 1: and we are live from the studios of wm NH
Speaker 1: ninety five point three FM Inglorious, Manchester, New Hampshire. And
Speaker 1: of course you can stream the show from anywhere. Go
Speaker 1: to Matt conorton dot com, slash live for all your
Speaker 1: live streaming options, social media links, contact infoshow, archives, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera. We also stream to Facebook and YouTube even LinkedIn.
Speaker 1: Of course, you can always find out more information about
Speaker 1: the show too at our new site, Matt Connorton Unleashed
Speaker 1: dot com. Get access to the archives and so forth.
Speaker 1: We have a searchable archive now on that site, so
Speaker 1: if you're looking for a specific guest, you can type
Speaker 1: that into the search bart Matt Connorton Unleashed dot com
Speaker 1: and it'll pull it right up for you, and of
Speaker 1: course at Matt conorton dot com we've got the full
Speaker 1: archive of the show as well, and it's it's on
Speaker 1: your streaming platform of choice, so wherever you like to
Speaker 1: get your podcasts, because we are a live radio show,
Speaker 1: but of course, like every live radio show these days,
Speaker 1: we're also streaming and it does go up as a
Speaker 1: podcast on your podcast platform of choice, So please subscribe
Speaker 1: to the show, or if you're on YouTube, please like
Speaker 1: and subscribe, etc. Etc. Today is Saturday, June twentieth, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty six. It is summer. It is my favorite time
Speaker 1: of year. I think is today the first day of
Speaker 1: summer according to the calendar or is that tomorrow? I'm
Speaker 1: not sure to me, June first is summer. It's certainly
Speaker 1: the start of meteorological summer. Hey, I said it without
Speaker 1: stumbling over at meteorological Wow. I'm getting good at this.
Speaker 1: My voice is not cracking as much as I expected
Speaker 1: it to be when I started the show. If you
Speaker 1: are listening live on Saturday, if you heard me in
Speaker 1: the very first hour of the show, my voice was
Speaker 1: cracking because allergies have been horrendous this year, not just
Speaker 1: for me, but for many people. But I thought by
Speaker 1: the time we got to the third hour my voice
Speaker 1: would be cracking pretty severely, but it seems to be
Speaker 1: at a minimum, so I'm able to somewhat maintain my
Speaker 1: dulcet tones, which is a very good thing. But yes,
Speaker 1: it is, of course Saturday, June twentieth, and we do
Speaker 1: have some interesting music news and one of these I
Speaker 1: was very surprised to see.
Speaker 3: Oh.
Speaker 1: Before we go any further too, I do want to
Speaker 1: mention the two world radio premieres that we had that
Speaker 1: we opened the hour with, of course, and we opened
Speaker 1: the show earlier with today. These are exclusive world premieres,
Speaker 1: meaning you will not hear these anywhere else until they
Speaker 1: are released online. We had Stop Turning, the new single
Speaker 1: from Flock Flok Flock Stop Turning comes out June twenty fourth,
Speaker 1: and the other one was Idle five their new single
Speaker 1: Blood in My Margarita, which comes out June twenty six,
Speaker 1: So those are not available yet. You heard them here first, literally,
Speaker 1: you heard them here first on Matt connorton Unleashed here
Speaker 1: on WMNH ninety five point three FM. So a couple
Speaker 1: of world radio premieres exclusively here, and thanks to our
Speaker 1: friends at Big gpr for sending us those They send
Speaker 1: us a lot of great stuff, So onward and upward
Speaker 1: in the meantime we go because we do have This
Speaker 1: relates to something we talked about earlier. We had members
Speaker 1: of the band The Surge on the show with us
Speaker 1: in the first hour and we were talking about CDs. Now,
Speaker 1: if you happen to hear that interview, you might know
Speaker 1: what I'm referring to, because they're in the UK and
Speaker 1: they were talking about how the new album Meow, which
Speaker 1: comes out in August. Their new album coming out in August,
Speaker 1: it's going to be they're going to have physical CDs.
Speaker 1: And this is a subject that comes up a lot
Speaker 1: on the show. When you're releasing music in the year
Speaker 1: twenty twenty six, how do you do it? Do you
Speaker 1: just do it digitally? Do you just put it out
Speaker 1: on the streaming platforms like Spotify and band camp and everything?
Speaker 1: Do you do physical CDs?
Speaker 3: Do you do?
Speaker 1: Vinyl? Vinyl very popular these days. Actually, what was it
Speaker 1: a few years ago? What was it maybe twenty twenty
Speaker 1: three or twenty twenty four, the first year since CDs
Speaker 1: came out that Vinyl actually outsold CDs, and I don't
Speaker 1: know where CDs fall right now in terms of how
Speaker 1: they're selling. But new music is still released on CD,
Speaker 1: certainly still released on vinyl. There's even indie artists putting
Speaker 1: out cassette tapes, not kidding. You can find them if
Speaker 1: you don't believe me. So physical media is still very
Speaker 1: much a thing. But gone are the days, or at
Speaker 1: least I thought gone were the days of people burning CDs. Now,
Speaker 1: if you are old enough to remember, there was a
Speaker 1: time when you could burn CDs. Burning meaning copying again
Speaker 1: for you very young people who don't know what I'm
Speaker 1: talking about, When you take a CD and you copy it,
Speaker 1: that is, whether or not that's okay or ethical is
Speaker 1: a subject that's been of debate since I was a kid. Geez.
Speaker 1: When I was a kid, we would copy cassette tapes.
Speaker 1: You know, if you had a dual cassette deck, you know,
Speaker 1: you could you could put a cassette in one side,
Speaker 1: press play on the other side, press press record, And
Speaker 1: sometimes that's how I would get music from my friends
Speaker 1: and they would get music from me. We would we
Speaker 1: would trade that way, you know, just I'll copy that
Speaker 1: tape for you, I'll copy that cassette but you know,
Speaker 1: eventually it became all about burning CDs. Anyone who was
Speaker 1: in a band in say the nineties or two thousands
Speaker 1: up until I don't know, maybe ten years ago, maybe
Speaker 1: not quite, but there was a period of time where
Speaker 1: if you were in a band, you might be burning CDs.
Speaker 1: You might be burning CDs to give out to people.
Speaker 1: You might be burning CDs to give to radio stations.
Speaker 1: You know, every once in a while, someone will bring
Speaker 1: us to CD here, you know, when we have guests
Speaker 1: in studio, they'll bring a CD, a physical CD. But
Speaker 1: it's not to play on the air. Even though we
Speaker 1: do have a functioning CD player here, it's not to
Speaker 1: play on the air. That's all done digitally. We just
Speaker 1: everything's online. They email us the tracks ahead of time.
Speaker 1: But you know, but they'll still they'll still bring in
Speaker 1: a physical CD and all the packaging and everything if
Speaker 1: they're releasing it on CD, because it is cool to
Speaker 1: have the physical media. You know, if you're a nerd
Speaker 1: like me, you like reading inner notes and things like
Speaker 1: that and have the artwork. I'll tell you when I
Speaker 1: first started interviewing musicians, and I've been at this a
Speaker 1: long time, I'm dating myself but when I first started,
Speaker 1: it was not uncommon, not only for a musician to
Speaker 1: hand me a CD and not email the tracks ahead
Speaker 1: of time. That's how long I've been doing this, where
Speaker 1: even though the technology existed, rather than emailing me the tracks,
Speaker 1: a musician who is going to be a guest on
Speaker 1: a show that I was doing, might actually hand me
Speaker 1: a burned CD with just a burned CD with and
Speaker 1: they write on it in magic mark or what it is,
Speaker 1: and then hand it to me. And then it's not
Speaker 1: even in a case. This would happen all the time,
Speaker 1: wouldn't even be in a case, and they would hand
Speaker 1: it to me on their finger. They would put the
Speaker 1: CD to put their finger, their index finger through the
Speaker 1: hole in the CD. And that's how they would hand
Speaker 1: me the CD and say, this is for the radio
Speaker 1: show or this is for the podcast. Thank god, those
Speaker 1: days are gone. I have to be honest with you.
Speaker 1: It never left. Not that I was ever a jerk
Speaker 1: about it, but it never left the greatest impression on me.
Speaker 1: When a guest or a potential guest would hand me
Speaker 1: their music on their finger, they would put their the
Speaker 1: CD on their finger, their burned CD that they wrote
Speaker 1: on it, labeled it with magic marker, and then ah,
Speaker 1: here you go. That never left the most professional impression,
Speaker 1: but it would happen more than you might think. So
Speaker 1: I prefer it the way we have it now. Everything
Speaker 1: is done digitally. If you want to bring me a CD, great,
Speaker 1: And I love getting CDs from our guests with the
Speaker 1: artwork and everything in the full package. But I do
Speaker 1: not miss the days of burned CDs, many of us. Again,
Speaker 1: if you're old enough to remember, you might have had
Speaker 1: one of those CD booklets that you would drive around
Speaker 1: in your car with. Right you got the CD booklet,
Speaker 1: you're putting the CDs and the CD player, and a
Speaker 1: lot of them were burned CDs, and and some of
Speaker 1: them you might not even know what they are because
Speaker 1: the magic marker wore off on them, but a lot
Speaker 1: of them would be burned CDs. So but anyway, that's
Speaker 1: a thing of the past, right, even though CDs still exists,
Speaker 1: and they're still making CDs and artists are still releasing
Speaker 1: music on CDs, burned CDs are a thing of the past, right,
Speaker 1: I'm building to something here, and and and those debates
Speaker 1: about whether or not it's okay to burn a CD
Speaker 1: or is that a form of piracy? That's also a
Speaker 1: thing of the past, right, because no one's burning CDs anymore.
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Okay, this is from Digitalmusicnews dot com, one of my
Speaker 1: favorite websites for music industry news. Oh by the way, uh,
Speaker 1: cheap and shameless plug. You can also now with greater consistency,
Speaker 1: because we're going to be putting up a lot of
Speaker 1: content on on both ipmnation dot com and on Matt
Speaker 1: connorton unleashed dot com. You are going to see a
Speaker 1: lot more content and a lot more articles and blogs. Uh,
Speaker 1: and that has already started. So just a quick shameless
Speaker 1: plug if you want some. For example, a couple new
Speaker 1: articles on ipmnation dot com all about college radio. They're there,
Speaker 1: check them out, please enjoy them. You're gonna see more
Speaker 1: on Matt connorton unleashed dot com, not just the show,
Speaker 1: but other show related content that isn't necessarily audio, but
Speaker 1: some articles just want to mention that. Get that in
Speaker 1: there anyway. Okay, So getting back to this, So Digitalmusicnews
Speaker 1: dot com has an article titled and this is the
Speaker 1: actual title. Yes, this is a twenty twenty six headline.
Speaker 1: Judge issues two year jail sentence for burning and selling CDs?
Speaker 1: Now who had that on their Bigo card in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty six. First of all, somebody acts in any time,
Speaker 1: in any year, in any era, somebody actually getting in
Speaker 1: trouble and actually facing some sort of legal consequence for
Speaker 1: burning the CD. Unheard of nobody whoever got caught doing that,
Speaker 1: whoever got in trouble for doing that?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: I mean yeah, maybe some people, but very few. Right,
Speaker 1: You just don't expect it. Nobody expects to get caught
Speaker 1: or punished, even if you are caught right for that,
Speaker 1: for burning a CD. Come on, but actual legal jeopardy
Speaker 1: like a two year jail sentence for burning and selling
Speaker 1: CDs in the year twenty twenty six. All right, well
Speaker 1: let's see again. This is from Digital Musicnews dot com.
Speaker 1: A UK man. Oh, it's funny too. This happened in
Speaker 1: the UK. I didn't preread this. I didn't have time.
Speaker 1: This happened in the UK. And uh, you know we
Speaker 1: were talking earlier to the Surge members of the band
Speaker 1: The Surge, who are from the UK, and we were
Speaker 1: talking about CDs. So all right. A UK man has
Speaker 1: received a twenty six month prison sentence after pleading guilty
Speaker 1: to the unauthorized mixing and selling of CDs in violation
Speaker 1: of copyright law. Now, I don't know. Maybe they're strict
Speaker 1: about that in the UK. That would never happen in
Speaker 1: the United States. I don't think it would. Maybe it hasn't.
Speaker 1: I just don't know about it. But again, in any era,
Speaker 1: can you imagine somebody actually being sentenced to prison for
Speaker 1: twenty six months over burned CDs? It just wouldn't happen, right,
Speaker 1: I don't think it would. Am I wrong? All right?
Speaker 1: It says here. The article goes on, if you thought
Speaker 1: the headline was from two thousand and two, you'd be forgiven. Instead,
Speaker 1: it's twenty twenty six and a man in the UK
Speaker 1: has been sentenced after pleading guilty to the unauthorized mixing
Speaker 1: and selling of CDs in violation of copyright law. Forty
Speaker 1: seven year old Mark Kerns was issued a twenty six
Speaker 1: month prison sentence, which will be suspended for eighteen months.
Speaker 1: He must also carry out two hundred and fifty hours
Speaker 1: of unpaid community service work. Oh mute the mic for
Speaker 1: a second. Speaking of allergies, my nose is getting very itchy,
Speaker 1: all right, Well, at least so at least this sentence
Speaker 1: is suspended. I assume when we say suspended sentence, I
Speaker 1: know what that means in the United States. Not from
Speaker 1: personal experience, mind you. I've never been in any trouble,
Speaker 1: but I know what that means in the United States.
Speaker 1: If your sentence is suspended, you're not going to do
Speaker 1: any time. The only way you're going to do any
Speaker 1: time is if you violate parole, if you get into
Speaker 1: some other kind of trouble, then that sentence can become
Speaker 1: unsuspended pretty quickly. But so it sounds like he's not
Speaker 1: actually going to prison if it's a suspended sentence. I assume,
Speaker 1: Oh wait a minute, no, I misread that he was
Speaker 1: issued a twenty six month prison sentence which will be
Speaker 1: suspended for eighteen months. So the twenty six month sentence,
Speaker 1: but it's suspended for eight Now I'm a little bit confused.
Speaker 1: What does that mean? So is it suspended for eighteen
Speaker 1: and then when he gets to month nineteen he has
Speaker 1: to go to prison for a few I don't know
Speaker 1: what that means. I guess it doesn't matter. I'm getting
Speaker 1: bogged down in details that are not necessarily relevant to
Speaker 1: the heart of the story. Continuing on again, This is
Speaker 1: from Digital Music News dot com. Kerns pleaded guilty to
Speaker 1: a number of charges at Whole Crown Court and was
Speaker 1: sentenced on Thursday. The sentence follows a lengthy investigation that
Speaker 1: began in mid twenty nineteen after the British phonographic industry
Speaker 1: became aware of the offenses in twenty eighteen. A warrant
Speaker 1: was issued in September twenty twenty two. Again, maybe they're
Speaker 1: much more strict about that. I mean, the laws exist here,
Speaker 1: but actual enforcement maybe they're more strict about that in
Speaker 1: the UK. Can you imagine here in the United States
Speaker 1: police show up at your door they've got a warrant
Speaker 1: for your arrest. You've been burning CDs. I mean, it's unfathomable,
Speaker 1: is it not? So? A spokesperson for the Yorkshire Council said, quote,
Speaker 1: this activity enabled him to commercially exploit protected material, generating
Speaker 1: income at the expense of legitimate artists and businesses within
Speaker 1: the music industry. Unquote. Maybe I don't know, Maybe it's
Speaker 1: that he was selling them. If he had just been
Speaker 1: burning them, he probably would have been fine. But was
Speaker 1: he But how much could he have even been? Prop Like?
Speaker 1: What was he doing? Was he burning them and then
Speaker 1: just selling them. Like, where was he selling these? Again?
Speaker 1: It's the year twenty twenty six. Who's buying these? Who's
Speaker 1: even buying these from him? Who?
Speaker 3: Like?
Speaker 1: What is the market for this? So this guy's I
Speaker 1: get it. He's burning the CDs and then he's selling
Speaker 1: them to make money. Who is buying the burns from him?
Speaker 1: Is he selling them people on the street? Is he
Speaker 1: like the guy like you know, you'd see this, uh,
Speaker 1: like on seventies TV shows or something, you know, like
Speaker 1: like on seventies Buddy cop shows like Startskin and Hutchet
Speaker 1: or whatever. You know, you'd see the guy, the guy
Speaker 1: on the street who's selling stolen watches. You know, he
Speaker 1: opens his jacket and you see all these stolen watch
Speaker 1: It's almost comical, right, it is kind of comical. You
Speaker 1: see all these stolen watches on the inside of his jacket.
Speaker 1: He's trying to sell you a Rolex or something, or
Speaker 1: a counter or their counterfeit watches something like that, Right,
Speaker 1: Is that what this guy was doing with the CDs?
Speaker 1: Is he on the street and he's just like opening
Speaker 1: his jacket and saying, hey, do you want to buy
Speaker 1: a burned CD? Is that what this guy was doing,
Speaker 1: because because who's buying these from him? That's what I
Speaker 1: don't understand. I mean, if you're going to make money
Speaker 1: at something, be it a legal and legitimate or something illicit,
Speaker 1: like you know, illicit quote unquote like burned CDs, there
Speaker 1: has to be a market for that. Who is the
Speaker 1: market for this? The more I think about it, the
Speaker 1: more bizarre this gets. But according to the spokesperson for
Speaker 1: the Yorkshire Council, this guy was commercially exploiting protected material. Ugh,
Speaker 1: let's see. Cabinet member Lynn Healing said, quote counterfeit and
Speaker 1: unauthorized goods undermine fair trading and can generate significant illicit profit.
Speaker 1: We will not hesitate to take robust enforcement action where
Speaker 1: offenses are identified, and this sentence sends a clear message
Speaker 1: that such activity will not be tolerated unquote. I'm stuck
Speaker 1: on the phrase generate significant illicit profit by selling these
Speaker 1: to who? Who was buying That's what I want to know,
Speaker 1: And I have a feeling we're not going to learn
Speaker 1: the answer in this article. Who was buying these? Where
Speaker 1: was the profit coming from? Is there a website you
Speaker 1: can sell these on burnedcds dot com I'm sure it
Speaker 1: would cost more to mail it than what anyone would
Speaker 1: pay for a burned CD. Oh you want to? You know,
Speaker 1: if you want a copy of Elton John's greatest hits,
Speaker 1: it's gonna cost you ten bucks at the music store.
Speaker 1: I'll sell you a burned copy for fifty cents plus shipping.
Speaker 1: It doesn't sound like a sound business model. I don't
Speaker 1: know how this works, all right? Getting back to the article, Oh,
Speaker 1: here we go. Interestingly, sources failed to identify whether Kerns
Speaker 1: was selling CDs online via social media, from a physical
Speaker 1: product stall. I'm sorry, I have a physical market stall,
Speaker 1: or perhaps from the trunk of his car, old school style. However,
Speaker 1: his CD burning and selling business must have left a
Speaker 1: significant and traceable commercial footprint for the UK government to
Speaker 1: have gotten involved to such an extent. Yes, is that
Speaker 1: even possible? Says here. The fact that CDs are not
Speaker 1: an entirely abandoned physical medium probably further added in his
Speaker 1: getting caught. As the vinyl boom has been hit with
Speaker 1: production snags, the CD industry has remained smaller but still
Speaker 1: notably bustling since its initial popularity over forty years ago,
Speaker 1: particularly in the K pop and J pop scenes, CDs
Speaker 1: and cassettes remained popular among fans for their ability to
Speaker 1: include limited or unique alternative album covers and photos. To
Speaker 1: that end, artists like Taylor Swift have continued to find
Speaker 1: success with the medium alongside vinyl in the West, streaming
Speaker 1: having largely taken over physical alternative alternatives over the past
Speaker 1: two decades. That's the end of the article. I want
Speaker 1: to know how this guy was selling them and how
Speaker 1: he was possibly making money at this This seems so
Speaker 1: bizarre to me, but yeah, I mean, CDs have had
Speaker 1: a resurgence, Vinyl of course, never went away and continues
Speaker 1: to flourish. And even cassettes, you know, that came up
Speaker 1: too again during my interview with the Surge. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's hard to believe. I think it was probably about
Speaker 1: ten years ago. I've told the story on the show before.
Speaker 1: Forgive me if it's if you've heard it, but just
Speaker 1: very briefly, I've told the story. I think it was
Speaker 1: about probably ten years ago. I was on band camp
Speaker 1: dot com and again, you know, I'm a big fan
Speaker 1: of band camp dot com, and I was looking for
Speaker 1: local artists and I happened to find and I can't
Speaker 1: remember the name, but they were a band from Keen Keen,
Speaker 1: New Hampshire who was selling cassettes, and I thought, oh,
Speaker 1: I saw this, and I thought, what an interesting sort
Speaker 1: of novelty thing, cassettes. They're actually selling cassettes, very retro
Speaker 1: kind of cool. I guess I don't know how many
Speaker 1: they're actually selling, who knows. But then I started poking
Speaker 1: around and I realized that there were all these sort
Speaker 1: of indie pop artists on band camp who were selling cassettes. Cassettes.
Speaker 1: It made this weird comeback. I guess if you enjoy
Speaker 1: the sound of tape hiss and all the trouble it
Speaker 1: causes when your cassette gets caught up in the in
Speaker 1: the gears, you know what a pain. I don't miss cassettes.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, I have nice memories of when I
Speaker 1: was a kid recording songs off the radio on my cassette.
Speaker 3: Oh.
Speaker 1: I hope these prosecuters in the UK don't hear about that.
Speaker 1: They want to track me down, have me extradited, because
Speaker 1: I'm sure at some point I recorded artists from the
Speaker 1: from the UK on my little cassette player. But you know,
Speaker 1: but there were a lot of trouble I remember when
Speaker 1: I was a kid actually using scotch tape too. If
Speaker 1: a cassette that I really loved, if it broke, using
Speaker 1: scotch tape to actually tape it back together, and sometimes
Speaker 1: it would actually work out, and sometimes it would not.
Speaker 1: But yes, that is a headline. In the year twenty
Speaker 1: twenty six, judge issues two year jail sentence for burning
Speaker 1: and selling CDs. I do want to know more about
Speaker 1: this guy. I'm gonna keep an eye on this story
Speaker 1: going forward because I want to know how he was
Speaker 1: doing it, how it could have possibly have been profitable
Speaker 1: before him, and how they could have been a big
Speaker 1: enough deal that UK prosecutors actually said we need to
Speaker 1: put this man in prison. These are answers that I see. Okay,
Speaker 1: we have time. I want to get to another thing.
Speaker 1: This is okay. This is from Music Business Worldwide dot com,
Speaker 1: another great site for music industry news. But this involves
Speaker 1: this involves our politicians, and we don't do politics on
Speaker 1: this iteration of the show, not anymore. We keep that
Speaker 1: for the podcast. We only do music and interviews and
Speaker 1: music industry news and so forth on the radio version
Speaker 1: of the show here at WMNH. But we do have
Speaker 1: politicians who are making laws about the music industry and
Speaker 1: about AI and all this stuff. And we've talked about
Speaker 1: the No Fakes Act on the show, which is trying
Speaker 1: to fight the proliferation of deep fakes. And these are
Speaker 1: all things that are going to continue to be problems
Speaker 1: that our politicians try to solve. Now, if you're a
Speaker 1: long time listener of the show, you've heard me talk
Speaker 1: about how I always get nervous when people in the
Speaker 1: House and Senate start talking about making laws making regulation
Speaker 1: about technology, because they very often have no idea what
Speaker 1: they're talking about. And some of them the questions that
Speaker 1: they ask in these Senate hearings, some of these people
Speaker 1: I wouldn't trust to be a shift manager at a
Speaker 1: Burger King, let alone making decisions about technology and how
Speaker 1: technology is to be used or not used, and how
Speaker 1: it must be regulated going forward. I get very nervous.
Speaker 1: And the example that I always like to use is
Speaker 1: if you don't believe me, if you think of being hyperbolic,
Speaker 1: go on YouTube. Not right now, wait till after the show,
Speaker 1: but when you get a chance, go on YouTube. Just
Speaker 1: look up Senate hearing Mark Zuckerberg. When you can find
Speaker 1: a congressional hearing of congress critters asking questions of Mark Zuckerberg.
Speaker 1: He's he's testified before Congress on multiple occasions. I believe
Speaker 1: and listen to some of the questions that these octogenarian
Speaker 1: and septagenarian senators and congressmen ask in these hearings, and
Speaker 1: the conclude usion that you might come to very quickly
Speaker 1: is holy crap. I do not want these people making
Speaker 1: decisions about technology and making laws and regulations about technology
Speaker 1: because they don't know what they're talking about. They're deeply confused,
Speaker 1: and they have no business getting involved in any of this,
Speaker 1: no thank you. They can only make things worse, not better.
Speaker 1: And to be fair, some of them are well informed
Speaker 1: and ask good questions, but a lot of them are
Speaker 1: just you know, and they're not serious people anyway. They're
Speaker 1: not there to solve anything. They're there to get some
Speaker 1: camera time that they can then use in a campaign
Speaker 1: ad the next time they're running for reelection. Let's be honest, okay,
Speaker 1: but this is important. So again from Music Businessworldwide dot Com,
Speaker 1: no fakes Senate panelbacks bill that could cost platforms seven
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand dollars per AI. Deep fake all right,
Speaker 1: let's take a look at this. The US Senate Judiciary
Speaker 1: Committee has advanced the No Fakes Act, the bipartisan bill
Speaker 1: that would create a federal rite protecting Americans voice and
Speaker 1: visual likeness from AI generated deep fakes. And again, that's
Speaker 1: something that's come up a lot on the show too,
Speaker 1: just recently. In fact, just last week we were talking
Speaker 1: about Lionel Richie has moved to trademark his voice, his
Speaker 1: actual voice, and can you do that? Will that work?
Speaker 1: What about people who sound similar? Obviously, it's one thing
Speaker 1: to trademark your visual likeness. You own your likeness no
Speaker 1: matter who you are, whether you're famous, whether you're not famous,
Speaker 1: whether you create any kind of art, whether you are
Speaker 1: completely anonymous in the world. Nobody can just take your
Speaker 1: visual likeness, your image and do whatever they want with it.
Speaker 1: You own that. But what about your voice anyway? Nal
Speaker 1: Richie says, yes, you can trademark your voice, and others
Speaker 1: have said that too, and that might be where things go.
Speaker 1: But again, this is about the No Fakes Act again,
Speaker 1: the bipartisan bill that would create a federal right protecting
Speaker 1: Americans voice and visual likeness from AI generated deep fakes.
Speaker 1: The Committee passed the bill unanimously by voice vote on Thursday.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, so then you've got all these bipartisan this
Speaker 1: bipartisan support. Republicans and Democrats unanimously agree on something. What
Speaker 1: could go wrong might be a good thing. I don't
Speaker 1: mean to be so cynical. Might be a good thing.
Speaker 1: I didn't preread this. I'm trying to keep an open mind.
Speaker 1: Might be a good thing. Let's see. So they passed
Speaker 1: the bill unanimously by voice But this is not a
Speaker 1: vote in Congress. This is on a committee. The committee.
Speaker 1: The Senate Committee passed the bill unanimously by voice vote,
Speaker 1: according to Deadline, which noted that three Republican Senators Mike Lee,
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz, and Eric Schmidt, raised First Amendment concerns. Yes, ah,
Speaker 1: that pesky first amendment clearing the committee sends them by
Speaker 1: the way, I don't like, I don't like I don't
Speaker 1: know anything about Eric Schmidt. I don't like Mike Lee
Speaker 1: or Ted Cruz. But just because I don't like them
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that they're wrong about everything. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I agree with their I'm not saying again, I'm keeping
Speaker 1: an open mind on this a deep fakes act. But somebody.
Speaker 1: There should always be at least one person in the
Speaker 1: room who says it, and by it, I mean what
Speaker 1: about the First Amendment. You should always have at least
Speaker 1: one person in every single room where a discussion like
Speaker 1: this is happening, who says that, I think, okay, it
Speaker 1: says here. Clearing the committee sends the bill toward a
Speaker 1: vote by the full Senate, after which it would still
Speaker 1: need to pass the thousand Representatives and be signed by
Speaker 1: the President before becoming law. The Nurture Originals, Foster Art,
Speaker 1: and Keep Entertainment Safe No Fakes Act would give every American,
Speaker 1: not only public figures, a federal right to authorize or
Speaker 1: block AI generated replicas of their voice and likeness. It
Speaker 1: carves out First Amendment uses such as news reporting and parity,
Speaker 1: and would establish a single national standard, a notice and
Speaker 1: takedown system for online services, and a counter notice process
Speaker 1: for material.
Speaker 2: Removed in error.
Speaker 1: Two things about that little paragraph that jump out at me,
Speaker 1: actually several things. Let's take the whole thing. It carves
Speaker 1: out First Amendment uses such as news reporting and parody.
Speaker 1: Parody must be protected, Parody and satire must be protected,
Speaker 1: so you don't want to accidentally make a law that
Speaker 1: infringes on that, and that gets people in trouble for
Speaker 1: engaging in parody and satire. That is critically important. Okay,
Speaker 1: next part of this and would establish a single national standard.
Speaker 1: A single national standard always concerns me. But maybe that's
Speaker 1: better than having a patchwork of state laws. Maybe maybe not.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm keeping an open mind. I'm not sure. Okay.
Speaker 1: A noticing takedown system for online services and a counternotice
Speaker 1: process for material removed in error. That's something I always
Speaker 1: worry about, people getting caught in the net who shouldn't be.
Speaker 1: It's happened to me with YouTube. I've gotten caught in
Speaker 1: the net on things where I've had videos taken down
Speaker 1: that shouldn't have been. I always appeal it. Sometimes I win,
Speaker 1: sometimes I lose. All right, but all of this is
Speaker 1: it makes me nervous. I'm not saying any of this
Speaker 1: is bad. I'm not saying that these are bad, that
Speaker 1: this is a bad idea. I'm just saying I don't
Speaker 1: trust this is I don't trust the government to get
Speaker 1: this right, and neither should you. It says here penalties
Speaker 1: under the bill are tiered five thousand dollars per work
Speaker 1: for an individual, twenty five thousand dollars per work for
Speaker 1: a company that creates or distributes a replica end up
Speaker 1: to seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars per work for
Speaker 1: an online service that fails to comply. Okay, let's stop
Speaker 1: there for a moment. Now, we're really getting into some
Speaker 1: trouble we have talked about on the show before. You
Speaker 1: know this notion that people have tried to make laws,
Speaker 1: people whom I tend to agree with politically but disagree
Speaker 1: with on this subject. They have tried to make laws
Speaker 1: saying that social media sites have to be fully responsible
Speaker 1: for what their users post, meaning if somebody, for example,
Speaker 1: if somebody posts something, if a lot like this were
Speaker 1: to actually go into effect, like what some people have
Speaker 1: tried to pass, if somebody posts something on social media
Speaker 1: on say, somebody posts something on Facebook and there's something
Speaker 1: illegal about the post, like maybe they're violently threatening somebody,
Speaker 1: which is illegal. That's criminal threatening. You can't do that
Speaker 1: and Facebook doesn't catch it. Facebook does police that stuff,
Speaker 1: or you know, you can report posts like that. But
Speaker 1: what if somebody posts something like that, Facebook doesn't catch
Speaker 1: it right away, and then they're they're getting fined by
Speaker 1: the government for allowing this post to be on their
Speaker 1: platform or YouTube. Somebody posts a video on YouTube that
Speaker 1: there's some sort of illegal activity going on in the
Speaker 1: video and it doesn't get flagged and removed right away,
Speaker 1: then these social media platforms would be held liable for
Speaker 1: what goes on their platforms, for everything that goes on
Speaker 1: their platforms, for everything their users do on their platforms,
Speaker 1: they would be liable or oh or a great example.
Speaker 1: You know, there was a Supreme Court decision about this
Speaker 1: and this was one of the Again I'm not a
Speaker 1: fan of the current Supreme Court as it is currently
Speaker 1: made up, but they got this one right. But it
Speaker 1: was about should Internet service providers be held responsible for
Speaker 1: everything that their users do using that service? So if
Speaker 1: someone does something illegal, say somebody has Exfinity for their
Speaker 1: Internet service and they do something illegal, should Exfinity be
Speaker 1: held liable for that? Now, the answer to all of
Speaker 1: these questions is no, you can't hold internet service providers
Speaker 1: responsible for everything their users do. You do you want
Speaker 1: internet service providers to go out of business because they're
Speaker 1: getting fined by the government every day over things that
Speaker 1: their users do that they can't possibly that the service
Speaker 1: prider can't possibly control. Do you want to effectively end
Speaker 1: social media? Some people would like to do you want
Speaker 1: to effectively end social media as we know it? Because
Speaker 1: all these social media companies are now held responsible for
Speaker 1: every little thing that everyone on those services, everything that
Speaker 1: they do, you can't do it. These companies do police
Speaker 1: their content. I have had many things over the years
Speaker 1: removed from Facebook because I allegedly broke some rule or something.
Speaker 1: Most of the time they don't even tell you what
Speaker 1: the rule was that you broke or what the post
Speaker 1: was reported for. I've had things again. I mentioned YouTube.
Speaker 1: I've had my problem with anybody who's a content creator
Speaker 1: has I had problems with YouTube. But this idea that
Speaker 1: now if you put a deep fake, if you make
Speaker 1: a deep fake, that violates the Deep Fakes Act or
Speaker 1: the No Fakes Act. I'm sorry, you know, if you
Speaker 1: put that, if you distribute that using an online service,
Speaker 1: and that online service fails to act, fails to see it,
Speaker 1: flag it, remove it, whatever they're gonna do, they could
Speaker 1: be fined three quarters of a million dollars by the government.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's a good idea because what's going
Speaker 1: to happen is this. If that's the law, and every
Speaker 1: time you put a video on YouTube and there's something
Speaker 1: in it, there's some AI generated content in that video,
Speaker 1: and YouTube is staring down the barrel of a potential
Speaker 1: three quarter of a million dollar fine because you put
Speaker 1: something on their platform that violates this new law. Imagine
Speaker 1: how much stuff is going to be getting taken down
Speaker 1: from YouTube on a daily basis because there's even the
Speaker 1: slightest possibility that YouTube is going to pay a heavy
Speaker 1: fine for allowing anything that even comes close to violating
Speaker 1: this law and the parameters set within it. So that's
Speaker 1: not workable. It's the kind of thing where you've got
Speaker 1: to hold individuals accountable, not the platforms. And all you
Speaker 1: can do is encourage the platforms to hold individuals accountable.
Speaker 1: But it has to be the platforms doing it. If
Speaker 1: it's the government doing it, then you're going to destroy
Speaker 1: these platforms in the process. Now, all that's assuming that
Speaker 1: any of this actually ends up being enforced in the end,
Speaker 1: which you may not. They may not. Okay, getting back
Speaker 1: to the article again. This is from Music Business Worldwide
Speaker 1: dot com in a statement issued on Thursday. RIAA chairman
Speaker 1: and CEO Mitch Glazier applauded the steadfast leadership of the
Speaker 1: bill's lead sponsors Senators Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, Chris Coons,
Speaker 1: Democrat of Delaware, Tom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina, and
Speaker 1: Amy Klovichar, Democrat of Minnesota, and Representatives Maria Elvira Salazar,
Speaker 1: Republican of Florida, Madeleine Dean Democratic Pennsylvania, Nathaniel Morin, Republican
Speaker 1: of Texas, Becca Blint, Democrat of Vermont, and Laurel Lee,
Speaker 1: Republican of Florida. Glazier said, quote, we are encouraged by
Speaker 1: today's passage in the Senate Judiciary Committee and look forward
Speaker 1: to the bill's passage into law later this year. Unquote.
Speaker 1: He's president of the RIAA. That's the organization that certifies.
Speaker 1: One of the things that they do is they certify albums.
Speaker 1: So if an album sells a million copies, it's a
Speaker 1: platinum record, they certify that. That's who certifies that officially,
Speaker 1: is the RIAA. If an album sells half a million copies,
Speaker 1: it's certified gold. They do that. That's one of the
Speaker 1: things that they do. I would suggest to Mitch Glazier
Speaker 1: think about how think about how this might impact the
Speaker 1: music industry in a negative way. Again, if you begin
Speaker 1: to scare the holy hell out of all of these
Speaker 1: platforms because now they think the government is going to
Speaker 1: be coming after them with these very large findes. The
Speaker 1: effect of that might be that everything becomes so safe
Speaker 1: and sanitized that some artists are not being promoted or
Speaker 1: able to promote themselves in the way that they once were.
Speaker 1: There could be a knock on effect here that could
Speaker 1: be very bad for the music industry, the chilling effect
Speaker 1: that it's going to come from this, um Glazier said more.
Speaker 1: He said, quote an extraordinary cross sector coalition including the
Speaker 1: creative community, child safety groups, free market groups, labor unions,
Speaker 1: free speech advocates, and AI developers have come together to
Speaker 1: support these protections for Americans voice and likeness from exploitive
Speaker 1: digital deep fakes. And consumers agree ninety two percent worry
Speaker 1: about the impact of AI deep fakes on authenticity, society,
Speaker 1: and culture. The No Fakes Act answers the call unquote.
Speaker 1: By the way, just to be clear, it count me
Speaker 1: in on that ninety two percent. I'm worried about all
Speaker 1: this too. I don't want you to think that. I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm just worried about these platforms getting fined out of
Speaker 1: existence by the government every time somebody posts a deep fake.
Speaker 1: I'm worried about that. I'm worried about you know, somebody
Speaker 1: who who it makes a music video using AI and
Speaker 1: they post it on YouTube, and then YouTube gets hit
Speaker 1: with their first three quarters of a million dollar fine
Speaker 1: from the government because maybe one of the actors in
Speaker 1: the music video looks like somebody famous. Oh, it's a
Speaker 1: deep fake now, and then YouTube starts, you know, closing
Speaker 1: all these accounts on YouTube because they're going to get
Speaker 1: very scared about taking any chances. They don't want to
Speaker 1: fight over this in court. Let's see the article says
Speaker 1: here it is a third attempt to pass the bill.
Speaker 1: A version introduced in July twenty twenty four ran out
Speaker 1: of time before that Congress ended, and in April twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five reintroduction failed to advance out of committee. A
Speaker 1: bipartisan group reintroduced the latest version, S four five nine
Speaker 1: to one the Senate and HR eight nine one five
Speaker 1: in the House on May twentieth. The bill has drawn
Speaker 1: support from Universal Music Groups, ONNY Music and Warner Music
Speaker 1: Group alongside Spotify, Google, Open, AI, IBM, and YouTube, as
Speaker 1: previously reported by MBW. Now, why would these groups or
Speaker 1: these companies, why would they support something that potentially could
Speaker 1: end up costing them a lot of money in fines?
Speaker 1: Why would they support that? I'll tell you why. What
Speaker 1: do they all have in common? Is there anybody in
Speaker 1: that list of people who you've never heard of? I mean,
Speaker 1: I think most people have heard of Universal Music Groups
Speaker 1: Onny Music Group and Warner Music Group. Right, you've certainly
Speaker 1: heard of Spotify, Google, Open, AI, IBM, and YouTube. There's
Speaker 1: nobody who hasn't heard of those, right, those are the
Speaker 1: big guys. If there's a possibility that a law like
Speaker 1: this could start to wipe out the smaller guys, the
Speaker 1: upstart services, you know, the the whatever, some video platform
Speaker 1: that wants to compete with YouTube, Huh, maybe this no
Speaker 1: Fakes Act, with its extraordinarily large finds, maybe it can
Speaker 1: be used to wipe out some of the competition. I
Speaker 1: can't think of any other reason why they would support this, because, again,
Speaker 1: it has the potential to cost everybody a lot of money.
Speaker 1: But but if you can get away with what you're
Speaker 1: doing because you're big enough, too big to fail. You're
Speaker 1: big enough to get away with what you're doing, but
Speaker 1: somebody smaller can't weather the storm that's going to come
Speaker 1: with this law if the government enforces it and levies
Speaker 1: the's fines those smaller companies, like who's a competitor to
Speaker 1: YouTube daily Motion? Maybe people are putting deep fake videos
Speaker 1: on daily Motion. Daily Motion gets fined out of existence.
Speaker 1: That's a victor for YouTube, right a little more here.
Speaker 1: The federal bill follows Tennessee's Elvis Act, the first US
Speaker 1: state law to treat a person's voice as a protected right,
Speaker 1: which took effect in twenty twenty four. A federal digital
Speaker 1: replica framework is also among the recommendations in the White
Speaker 1: House's National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence, which the administration
Speaker 1: released in March. The framework says Congress should consider establishing
Speaker 1: a federal framework protecting individuals from the unauthorized distribution or
Speaker 1: commercial use of AI generated digital replicas of their voice, likeness,
Speaker 1: or other identifiable attributes, while providing exceptions for parity, satire,
Speaker 1: and news reporting part of the problem too. And I
Speaker 1: didn't mention this earlier, and I should have when we
Speaker 1: were talking briefly about parity and satire these things can
Speaker 1: be subjective. What one person thinks is parody or satire
Speaker 1: another person might think is hate speech. And hate speech
Speaker 1: is never protected. I mean, in theory, it's you could
Speaker 1: argue it even hate speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Speaker 1: But I don't know that that part's gonna get tricky.
Speaker 1: That part always gets tricky. Uh. Not every stakeholder backs
Speaker 1: the bill, the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Now see see who's
Speaker 1: heard of the Electronic Frontier Foundation?
Speaker 3: Have you?
Speaker 1: I haven't. This is a smaller entity, but they oppose
Speaker 1: the bill. Why probably because they know they're gonna The
Speaker 1: big guys are a lot less likely to get wiped out.
Speaker 1: But somebody we've never heard of, they could be in
Speaker 1: danger from this. It says the Electronic Frontier Foundation has
Speaker 1: urged Congress to reject it, warning it could become a
Speaker 1: tool for online censorship that sweeps up parody, news and criticism.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it's coming. The companion Bill HR eight nine
Speaker 1: one five was referred to the House Judiciary Committee after
Speaker 1: its introduction and has not yet had a markup. So
Speaker 1: there you go. That's it for that. I think that's
Speaker 1: about it for us. Do we have time to get
Speaker 1: one more thing in. I had a few different news
Speaker 1: stories here. Oh this is well, we got a couple
Speaker 1: things here. I can't sneak one more thing in. Well
Speaker 1: this might be this might be some competition for YouTube.
Speaker 1: We won't read the whole article, but Spotify now the headline.
Speaker 1: This is from Music Business Worldwide dot com. Spotify opens
Speaker 1: direct uploads for music videos and live performances in beta.
Speaker 1: So Spotify is opening up to video basically, so now
Speaker 1: not only will Spotify of audio, but Spotify will have
Speaker 1: music videos on it and live performances. That could be
Speaker 1: a real threat to YouTube, because I mean, some people
Speaker 1: all they use YouTube for is for music videos. It's
Speaker 1: interesting too with music videos. If you talk to someone
Speaker 1: who doesn't know anything about the current music business and
Speaker 1: how it all works, a lot of people will tell you.
Speaker 1: I hear people my age and younger say this, and
Speaker 1: it's hard to even explain it to them. They'll say
Speaker 1: things like, oh, I miss MTV. Now music videos don't
Speaker 1: even exist. I wish there were still music videos. I
Speaker 1: used to love music videos, And whenever someone says that
Speaker 1: to me, I just want to grab them by the
Speaker 1: shoulders and say and shake them a little bit and
Speaker 1: say have you never heard of YouTube. Look, there are
Speaker 1: more music videos than ever. For anyone who doesn't know this,
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to make fun of you, but anybody
Speaker 1: who watch it, because I hear it all the time.
Speaker 1: It's not like something I hear once in a while.
Speaker 1: I hear all the time. I see people posting about
Speaker 1: it on social media. I mean, it's kind of a
Speaker 1: boomer thing to say, but even Gen xers will say this,
Speaker 1: Oh I miss music videos. There's no music video anymore. Guys,
Speaker 1: there's more music videos than ever. Everyone makes music videos now,
Speaker 1: and if you're a major artist, who can afford it
Speaker 1: some of the some some major label artists. Beyonce has
Speaker 1: done it, Metallica has done it. Other bands have done it.
Speaker 1: When they put out a new album or an EP,
Speaker 1: they'll release a music video for every single track. Everybody's
Speaker 1: making videos now. There are more music videos than there
Speaker 1: have ever been. I'm sorry you miss MTV and is
Speaker 1: VH one still a rounder? Did that go away too?
Speaker 1: I'm sorry you miss your video channel, but you can
Speaker 1: go on YouTube and see all kinds of music videos.
Speaker 1: You have more access to music videos than you ever
Speaker 1: have at any point in history. It's just a little
Speaker 1: bit of a pet peeve I have when I heard, oh,
Speaker 1: there's no more more music videos. There's more music videos
Speaker 1: than ever. And if you long for, if you're pining
Speaker 1: for the music videos of your youth, when you used
Speaker 1: to sit and watch MTV.
Speaker 3: I get it.
Speaker 1: I get I grew up in that era. But guess
Speaker 1: what think of a video you saw when you were
Speaker 1: a kid that you watched on MTV. I guarantee you
Speaker 1: it's on YouTube. You can watch it right now, or
Speaker 1: better yet, explore some new music because there's lots of
Speaker 1: music videos. If you want music videos, there's lots and
Speaker 1: lots and lots and lots and lots of music videos.
Speaker 1: So please, just everybody stop with the uh oh MTV
Speaker 1: is dead and there's no more videos. Yeah there are. Sorry,
Speaker 1: how's a pet peeve of mine. I got a little
Speaker 1: snarky about that. I don't mind when boomers say it,
Speaker 1: but when people my age say it, when Gen xer
Speaker 1: say it, it's like you make us all sound old
Speaker 1: because you're saying something that's not true. There are more.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry you miss MTV, but please, you're dragging our
Speaker 1: entire generation down when you say stupid things that are
Speaker 1: objectively false and easily disprovable. You know, to stop it,
Speaker 1: all right, We're just about out of time. I do
Speaker 1: want to get at least one more song into end
Speaker 1: today's show, but I do want to thank everybody first
Speaker 1: who joined us today. Of course, in the first hour
Speaker 1: we had the surge. In the second hour we had
Speaker 1: low Sunday both great bands. Really enjoyed talking with everybody.
Speaker 1: Our number three guests did not work out due to
Speaker 1: a miscommunication. We'll see if we can reschedule them. It's bummer.
Speaker 1: I was really looking forward to talking with the members
Speaker 1: of Beaker, but that did not work out. But that
Speaker 1: happens sometimes. It's okay.
Speaker 3: Though.
Speaker 1: We had plenty of music industry news to talk about,
Speaker 1: as we always do. There is always so much going on.
Speaker 1: If you missed any part of today's show, it will
Speaker 1: be up in just a little bit, of course. It
Speaker 1: goes up on Wmnhradio dot org. You can also find
Speaker 1: it on my website, Matt connorton dot com. You can
Speaker 1: find it at Matt Connerton Unleashed dot com. It's on YouTube,
Speaker 1: it's on facebooo, it's even on LinkedIn. We put it everywhere,
Speaker 1: and please, of course, subscribe to the podcast. You know
Speaker 1: it goes out to Spotify and everywhere else. Subscribe on
Speaker 1: your podcast platform of choice. We really appreciate it. It
Speaker 1: helps the show, helps our numbers. And of course if
Speaker 1: it's on YouTube that you enjoyed the show, please like
Speaker 1: and subscribe. There's the one little extra step there. I'm
Speaker 1: sure you don't mind, but thank you everyone who supports
Speaker 1: the show. Oh one other thing, people speaking to people
Speaker 1: supporting the show. I did see some people in the
Speaker 1: chat room that I want to make sure that we
Speaker 1: acknowledge who I am. And Thras in the chat room
Speaker 1: says yay, good morning Hello. We've had them on the
Speaker 1: show many times. Of course, I also saw Larry from
Speaker 1: Loud Entertainment was in there earlier. Who else did I see?
Speaker 1: Be Pinard says good morning everyone, Hello to our friend
Speaker 1: b Pinard. Let's see. I thought I saw somebody else
Speaker 1: in there too that I wanted to mention. Isaac Banks
Speaker 1: in the chat room. Oh, Awaiting Abigail our friends Awaiting
Speaker 1: Abigail a great band from Texas. We have featured on
Speaker 1: the show so many times and I got to go
Speaker 1: see them live during the winter. Great band love Awaiting Abigail.
Speaker 1: Eric Gagnan EASYG is in the chatroom as well. Hello, Eric,
Speaker 1: and I just want to make sure we don't miss
Speaker 1: anybody in there. I kind of feel like you might
Speaker 1: remember Romper Room, the show Romper Room, the kids show.
Speaker 1: At the end of every episode, she would look into
Speaker 1: the magic mirror and she would say hello to everybody,
Speaker 1: and she would just list off a random, you know,
Speaker 1: random batch of names. But when she said when whenever
Speaker 1: she said I see Matthew, I would get very excited.
Speaker 1: I was like asking my mom, how can she see me?
Speaker 1: Of course I knew better, but did I really Maybe
Speaker 1: I was just a dumb kid. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: do want to end with one more track from Low
Speaker 1: Sunday from their EP, The Black EP. I have become
Speaker 1: an instant fan of these guys. They are so so good.
Speaker 1: What did we play already? We played This is not
Speaker 1: having your so Wired and shattered? Let's play I think
Speaker 1: we should play someone to Talk To. I really love
Speaker 1: these guys. They have such a cool sound. Call it shoegaze,
Speaker 1: call it dark wave, call it whatever you want, but
Speaker 1: their music is almost hypnotic, speaking of which you can
Speaker 1: book a hypnotherapy session with me. Go to mattconnorton dot com.
Speaker 1: You can book that right. Online consultation is always free.
Speaker 1: We will end the show with this again, thank you
Speaker 1: so much everybody for joining us. And here it is.
Speaker 1: This is someone to talk to from Low Sunday to
Speaker 1: close out this week's Matt Connorton on Leash. I'll talk
Speaker 1: to y'all a little bit later Bye, everybody.
Podbean