Field Dispatch
Matt Connarton Unleashed: Journey legal drama continues
Speaker 1: This drama in the music industry, and Journey has proven
Speaker 1: to be I'm fascinated by something if you haven't followed it, Journey.
Speaker 1: Of course, these bandmates in Journey.
Speaker 2: You know, you can't.
Speaker 1: Blame Steve Perry really for all these years of not
Speaker 1: wanting to go back. I can understand why the title
Speaker 1: of it, yeah that while Billboard has a new article up,
Speaker 1: don't stop Litigating, do stop Journey bandmates are battling in
Speaker 1: court yet again. What has always fascinated me about bands
Speaker 1: that don't get along and they have all this acrimony
Speaker 1: and even in some instances, you know, suing each other
Speaker 1: while they're in a band together. I've always been fascinated
Speaker 1: by the dynamics of that and how weird it must
Speaker 1: be to be in a band and have issues with
Speaker 1: other band members to the point where you're suing each
Speaker 1: other and yet still be able to go on stage
Speaker 1: and play with them.
Speaker 2: That's always fascinating to me.
Speaker 3: It's an odd dynamic because how do you do that
Speaker 3: and not bash each other with the guitars or something.
Speaker 2: Well, and and you know there have been instances, I mean, geez.
Speaker 1: You can find YouTube compilations of of of bands getting
Speaker 1: into fights on stage, and.
Speaker 3: Like, what, what's a good one? I can't think of
Speaker 3: somebody getting into a fight.
Speaker 1: On Marilyn Manson. And there's a YouTube video of him
Speaker 1: kicking John five. This is from quite a few years ago,
Speaker 1: and they're good now, but.
Speaker 3: On stage he kicked him.
Speaker 1: He kicked John five. No, no, but but kicked him.
Speaker 1: And then you see John Five like throw down his
Speaker 1: guitar and he's gonna fight him, and.
Speaker 3: Oh geez, yeah they really had.
Speaker 1: That's that's one example. There's of course, a famous I
Speaker 1: need to go on.
Speaker 3: And exploratory now. I want to see these videos.
Speaker 1: There's a famous example of and there's no video of this,
Speaker 1: there's only audio, and I think the audio it's hard
Speaker 1: to hear. But there's a famous example of the Eagles
Speaker 1: where they almost came to well, they were threttening each other,
Speaker 1: like Don Felder and Glenn Fry kept threatening that you
Speaker 1: know after the set, you know we're gonna fight between songs,
Speaker 1: you know, sniping at each other that kind of thing.
Speaker 3: So but this this is I mean, I feel like
Speaker 3: this good reason on this one.
Speaker 1: Well, but what's always interested me about this is and
Speaker 1: I remember when I first became sort of fascinated by
Speaker 1: that dynamic. And it was before I even started playing
Speaker 1: in bands myself. And you know, when you play in
Speaker 1: a band, you know sometimes you have conflict. And although
Speaker 1: rarely most most of the bands I played in were
Speaker 1: pretty free of inter band drama. But when I was like,
Speaker 1: and my dad, you know, he listens to the show,
Speaker 1: he might remember this. When I was a kid, I
Speaker 1: watched a documentary with my dad and I don't remember
Speaker 1: if it was a documentary specifically about Brian Brian Adams,
Speaker 1: No from the Beach Boys, Brian Wilson. I don't remember
Speaker 1: if it was specifically about Brian Wilson or if it
Speaker 1: was a broader documentary about the Beach Boys. But there
Speaker 1: was a point, and it was really when they were
Speaker 1: kind of at the height of their their fame where
Speaker 1: they were touring and the group and obviously the Beach Boys,
Speaker 1: there's a bunch of members. They had kind of split
Speaker 1: into two factions and because they weren't getting along, like
Speaker 1: there was the Brian Wilson faction and the Mike Love faction.
Speaker 3: Didn't even know that and.
Speaker 1: They would actually enter the stage when it was time
Speaker 1: to play. They would enter the stage both factions from
Speaker 1: opposite sides of the stage, so that they because they
Speaker 1: tried to keep apart, almost like two rival gangs. So
Speaker 1: they would keep apart, you know, before and after the shows,
Speaker 1: but they would actually enter from opposite sides. And then
Speaker 1: of course they wouldn't interact at all except for playing
Speaker 1: these songs together.
Speaker 3: But I mean, just that's gonna be so bizarre to
Speaker 3: stand on a stage playing music. You would think, so
Speaker 3: you're together, but you're not. Well, how does that work?
Speaker 3: Did they just because they're not going to play their
Speaker 3: guitars and lean into each other?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 3: Yeah, none of the like did they have like you know,
Speaker 3: you stay away one hundred feet from me on the stage,
Speaker 3: don't cross this line. They're gonna take a piece of
Speaker 3: tape and like put it down the middle. This is
Speaker 3: my side.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's so weird.
Speaker 1: And but I also wonder too about practical things like
Speaker 1: how do you even write a set.
Speaker 2: List if if you can't even speak to each other,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean? An intermediary or there's probably
Speaker 2: one person who who.
Speaker 3: Is in charge with the legal pad of paper and
Speaker 3: he's going back and forth. We want to play these songs. Okay,
Speaker 3: I'll go to the other faction. Can you agree to
Speaker 3: these songs in this order? No, we need to move
Speaker 3: this and this and they go back. That's gotta be.
Speaker 2: Oh boy, Yeah, it's got to be very because we.
Speaker 3: Have like lawyers negotiating everything and have like documents on
Speaker 3: how what how the set is gonna run and how
Speaker 3: much time each one's gonna get. That's terrible and this
Speaker 3: is sad. It's like all these bands from when we
Speaker 3: were younger are like suing each other, you know what
Speaker 3: I mean, Like Darryl holl and John Oh, it's that's
Speaker 3: lawsuits and Journey's got lawsuits and like everybody's against you.
Speaker 3: But the weird and.
Speaker 1: W but the weird thing with Journey is some of
Speaker 1: this litigation that's been going on between Jonathan Kane and
Speaker 1: Neil Sean has been going on for years. Like they've
Speaker 1: been out on tours while there was active litigation between them,
Speaker 1: you know. So that's like, you know, that's a step
Speaker 1: further than just not getting along or not really speaking
Speaker 1: to each other much.
Speaker 3: But they have their they have themselves set up as
Speaker 3: a company with directors.
Speaker 2: Yeah, which which is which Steve Perry is still a
Speaker 2: part of.
Speaker 1: By the way, Oh, and then there was that weird
Speaker 1: thing a few years ago where and this for this thing,
Speaker 1: I think Jonathan Kane and Neil Sean were on the
Speaker 1: same side where Ross Valerie and the other guy's name
Speaker 1: I can't remember now, Steve something. They actually they actually
Speaker 1: tried to take over the company. They tried to do
Speaker 1: some weird legal maneuvering where they were going to take
Speaker 1: over ownership of the company, the Control's Journey. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: they ended up And that's why they ended up getting
Speaker 1: kicked out of the band was because they tried to
Speaker 1: take over. And I think Steve Ferry even got involved. Again,
Speaker 1: he's not in the band, hasn't been for decades now
Speaker 1: for them now, Arnelle Paneda.
Speaker 2: He's been in the band for a long time. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he's been in the band a long time now.
Speaker 3: But okay, so let's get into some meat. Shoan Is
Speaker 3: was sued by Cain because he said Caine says, you
Speaker 3: unfairly blocked me from the company's American Express account. But
Speaker 3: Shona is saying, yeah, but I did that because you're
Speaker 3: using it, you're misusing it, and you're using money to
Speaker 3: pay for like you in your wife's hotel room. So this.
Speaker 3: It's always the money. It's always the money. It's always
Speaker 3: the money. But Caine is claiming that Shan has spent
Speaker 3: up to ten thousand dollars per night for hotel rooms
Speaker 3: during their most tour. Ten thousand dollars a night. Where
Speaker 3: are you staying? Where in the heck.
Speaker 2: Are you staying this journey? They're famous?
Speaker 3: Oh my god, like you could. You could rent a
Speaker 3: home for somebody for a year for one night stay
Speaker 3: in this hotel. It's insane. Who spends Why why do
Speaker 3: you spend ten grand on a hotel room? Why you're
Speaker 3: gonna you're barely gonna be in it.
Speaker 1: I mean, if it was somebody like Motley Crue, you
Speaker 1: know back in the day, you would you would figure, well,
Speaker 1: they probably wreck everything, and they did.
Speaker 3: That's why they needed ten thousand for a night though,
Speaker 3: because they had to replace hoteur.
Speaker 1: But I don't think Jonathan Kane is throwing a couch
Speaker 1: out a window.
Speaker 3: Sounds like he's being exorbitant in a spending Yeah, you know,
Speaker 3: so Cain has shown each control exactly fifty percent of
Speaker 3: the company. Yeah, so which is you've got You've got
Speaker 3: heads just solid into each other.
Speaker 1: Which is not the same as ownership. We should we
Speaker 1: should clarify.
Speaker 3: That control versus ownership is different.
Speaker 1: Right right, Because, like I said, Steve Perry still own
Speaker 1: I don't know the guys who are cast out of
Speaker 1: the band, I don't know if they still own part
Speaker 1: of the company as well. Like I said, they tried
Speaker 1: to take control of it and it got them fired
Speaker 1: from the band. But that doesn't mean they don't still
Speaker 1: own stakes in the company. But yes, Neil Sean and
Speaker 1: Jonathan Kane, and by the way, for it.
Speaker 3: Give me any number of people with steaks in the company.
Speaker 3: I mean, yeah, it's not even limited to the band
Speaker 3: members themselves.
Speaker 1: And for those who don't know, Neil Sean of course
Speaker 1: is a guitar player, and Jonathan Kane is the keyboard
Speaker 1: player who occasionally plays guitar on some songs that don't
Speaker 1: have keyboard, like a Stone in Love for example.
Speaker 3: It's like they're going head to head. So another one
Speaker 3: of the issues that these guys are doing is one
Speaker 3: of them will fire somebody and then maybe a few
Speaker 3: hours or days later, the other one will rehire the
Speaker 3: same person that got fired. Yeah, so you got one,
Speaker 3: director goes, I can't stand you get out and then
Speaker 3: like two days later, the other one goes, come back,
Speaker 3: come back.
Speaker 2: Well, here's what this is.
Speaker 3: It's like it's it's like tip for tat, I'm gonna
Speaker 3: get you.
Speaker 2: This is you know, Yeah, it's not It's no way
Speaker 2: to run a business.
Speaker 3: No, this is terrible. I mean and I can't even
Speaker 3: imagine me. Can you imagine being an employee if one
Speaker 3: you get to worry, if one director doesn't like you,
Speaker 3: they might toss you. You get a stay in somebody's
Speaker 3: good side to stay in the company.
Speaker 1: Well, this is from Billboard dot com. It says a
Speaker 1: never any legal battle between Journey members Jonathan Kan and
Speaker 1: Neil Sean erupted again this week, with Kane filing a
Speaker 1: new lawsuit against Sean overclaims that is exorbitant spending is
Speaker 1: threatening to cripple the band's touring operations, and a complaint
Speaker 1: made public and Delaware Court on Tuesday, July thirtieth. Kane
Speaker 1: claimed that Shawn's alleged spending, including unilaterally chartering private jets
Speaker 1: and charging personal expenses to their shared American Express card,
Speaker 1: has led to a deadlock that must be resolved. Kine's
Speaker 1: lawyers right quote. The deadlock between the company's directors, is
Speaker 1: now interfering with the company's ability to take even the
Speaker 1: most basic actions, and is causing significant disruptions in the
Speaker 1: smooth operation of the company. The problems posed a severe
Speaker 1: threat of harm to the company and to Journey's storied
Speaker 1: history of musical greatness.
Speaker 2: Unquote.
Speaker 1: Legal battles are nothing new for Sean and Kin, the
Speaker 1: two remaining members of an iconic rock band that still
Speaker 1: is printing money money decades after its Don't Stop Believe
Speaker 1: in Heyday. Back in twenty twenty two, Sean sued Caine
Speaker 1: over allegations that his bandmate had unfairly blocked his access
Speaker 1: to the American Express account, interfering with the band's activities
Speaker 1: and delaying payments to crew members and vendors. A few
Speaker 1: months later, Caine sued him back, claiming he had placed
Speaker 1: those restrictions on the MX to stop Sean from misusing
Speaker 1: the company card, including spending four hundred thousand dollars in
Speaker 1: a single month. So they both accuse each other of overspending.
Speaker 1: The new case, filed in Delawarre's Clansery Court, largely rehashes
Speaker 1: those same disagreements over spending, like Caine claiming that Sean
Speaker 1: has quote spent up to ten thousand dollars per night
Speaker 1: for hotel rooms for him and his wife unquote during
Speaker 1: their most recent tour. But in technical terms, the new
Speaker 1: case focuses narrowly on the governance of Freedom twenty twenty, Inc.
Speaker 1: A Delaware based corporate entity that's that they created to
Speaker 1: operate Journeys touring. Since Cain and Sean each control exactly
Speaker 1: fifty percent of the company, the lawsuit says the two
Speaker 1: have reached an impasse that is spilled into other aspects
Speaker 1: of the band's operations, like managing their staffers. By the way,
Speaker 1: the reason this company exists to begin with this Freedom
Speaker 1: twenty twenty Inc. Is because apparently a number of years ago,
Speaker 1: this if I'm remembering this correctly, this is what I've read,
Speaker 1: because I've tried to follow all the journey drama as
Speaker 1: much as possible, and I am a fan, you know.
Speaker 1: But a number of years ago, Neil shown and his
Speaker 1: wife started looking into They started looking more closely at
Speaker 1: journeys of financial operations as a band from a business standpoint,
Speaker 1: because they had a manager and they felt like the manager.
Speaker 1: Not that I don't think this was a case of
Speaker 1: the manager. You know, you hear about this a lot
Speaker 1: in the music industry. You know, a manager stealing or
Speaker 1: or somebody's ripping off the band, or you know, or
Speaker 1: a band suing their record label because they feel like
Speaker 1: their record label is stealing from them.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of horror stories.
Speaker 1: But this was a case of they just they started
Speaker 1: to when they looked into things. Neil Sewan and his
Speaker 1: wife felt like Journey was getting a raw deal.
Speaker 2: You know, they were playing.
Speaker 1: These venues and but they didn't seem to be making
Speaker 1: that much money, and they didn't understand where the money
Speaker 1: was going, what was happening to their profits and whatnot.
Speaker 1: So they I think they just basically fired their entire
Speaker 1: management team at the time and said, we're going to
Speaker 1: run everything ourselves. Other artists have tried to do that.
Speaker 1: It's hard to do at that level.
Speaker 2: Years ago.
Speaker 1: I saw a documentary about back in the nineties when
Speaker 1: Duran Duran tried to do it.
Speaker 2: They actually tried to.
Speaker 1: They fired their their management team and said, We're just
Speaker 1: going to do everything ourselves.
Speaker 2: We can do everything ourselves. Why are we paying out
Speaker 2: all this money?
Speaker 3: And oh yeah, they did that.
Speaker 2: They well they did.
Speaker 1: You might not have known, because unless you happen to
Speaker 1: see this particular documentary, because it didn't last long. They
Speaker 1: did it, they tried it, and they said, oh my god,
Speaker 1: we are in so far over our heads. We cannot
Speaker 1: run this band this way. So then they undid, you know,
Speaker 1: they hired a new management team and everything, and they
Speaker 1: said never again. Kiss during the eighties for a long
Speaker 1: period of time, they didn't have a manager per se.
Speaker 1: They had their the accounting firm they were working with,
Speaker 1: Glickman Marx was kind of their kind of their managers,
Speaker 1: and that they they you know, we kind of ran
Speaker 1: the business of Kiss. But Kiss was essentially self managed
Speaker 1: actually at a couple of points during their career, and
Speaker 1: they managed to pull it off.
Speaker 3: Jean's are real business minded guy though, like.
Speaker 1: Well, and so is Paul Stanley and they yeah, and
Speaker 1: they they managed they got away.
Speaker 3: They've always treated it like a business. Yes, that's a
Speaker 3: big and they also don't have as much I mean, yeah,
Speaker 3: there was some alcohol, but they didn't have like that
Speaker 3: as a as a bigger issue, right, Yeah, whereas other
Speaker 3: bands of that era, it was all of the band
Speaker 3: was doing that, right. These guys kept their heads on straight.
Speaker 2: The whole time.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, and we're always treating it like a business.
Speaker 1: Right yeah, like all this stuff with Journey, you cannot
Speaker 1: imagine this happening and kiss, anything like this would would
Speaker 1: never happen in Kiss. So again, this is from Billboard
Speaker 1: dot com. In technical terms, the new case focus is narrowly.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm sorry, I read that part already. Let me
Speaker 1: go down here. So Cain's lawyer, this is what Jonathan
Speaker 1: Kaine's lawyers say in the lawsuit. Quote, Petitioner and respondent
Speaker 1: are deadlocked with regard to issues concerning the hiring and
Speaker 1: firing of company employees and band crew members. It is
Speaker 1: common that one director will terminate an employee or crew member,
Speaker 1: and hours or days later, the other director will rehire
Speaker 1: that same individual.
Speaker 2: Unquote.
Speaker 1: As you mentioned earlier, the lawsuit claims the strife between
Speaker 1: Cain and Shawn has also led to other problems, including
Speaker 1: disagreements about whether to accept an advance from AEG for
Speaker 1: their most recent tour, the purchase of cancelation insurance, and
Speaker 1: other problems. Cain's lawyer's right quote. The deadlock between petitioner
Speaker 1: and respondent has created a toxic internal environment. Rather than
Speaker 1: focusing on the band's performances during a major international tour.
Speaker 1: The band's members and crew now find themselves caught in
Speaker 1: the middle of the director's disputes, afraid of performing their
Speaker 1: job responsibilities, and pressured to align with one director or
Speaker 1: another unquote that's.
Speaker 3: Horrible work environment. Oh yeah, the music can't imagine.
Speaker 2: The music industry is hard enough without all this.
Speaker 3: Talk about hiding from your bosses.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, get in the bathroom they're coming, well, or
Speaker 1: hiding from one of them, exactly.
Speaker 3: From both of them. I feel like I just don't
Speaker 3: want to be in the middle of any of this.
Speaker 2: I think in this stay in this situation.
Speaker 1: Probably some of them they hide from whichever one fired
Speaker 1: them and try and try to stay close to whichever one.
Speaker 3: Really doesn't see me. You won't know I got.
Speaker 1: Brought back, Yeah, exactly, it says here. As a solution,
Speaker 1: Ken is asking the court to appoint a neutral third
Speaker 1: director of the company who will be able to issue
Speaker 1: the tie breaking vote during disputes over key issues.
Speaker 3: Well, what they're like divorced parents fighting over their children.
Speaker 2: Well, what they need is a manager. See it sounds
Speaker 2: like they don't have a.
Speaker 3: Third person to be Well, they're supposed to have a
Speaker 3: third person, but it doesn't really go into the much.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well it sounds like.
Speaker 3: Oh the ohh whoats because I jumped ahead.
Speaker 1: It sounds like they don't have a manager either, right,
Speaker 1: so they're they're just they're running everything themselves. I think
Speaker 1: there's managers to a point, well, because part of what
Speaker 1: a manager of a band does is say, you know,
Speaker 1: like if there's a dispute like this, the manager says, look,
Speaker 1: we're going to do this.
Speaker 2: You know, you guys hired me to run this band.
Speaker 2: Here's what we're gonna do.
Speaker 3: Kin is asking the court to appoint a third director
Speaker 3: who could be a neutral director that could issue a
Speaker 3: tie breaking vote on all of these issues. Because you
Speaker 3: just it's divorced. It's like divorced parents fighting over the
Speaker 3: kids in the house.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's that's.
Speaker 3: You get these two equal in ownership, I mean equal
Speaker 3: indecision making right fifty to fifty directors and they don't agree.
Speaker 3: And they not only do they not agree, they set
Speaker 3: out to go against the other one. Oh you fired so,
Speaker 3: and so I'm gonna bring them back.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So this is yeah, they're it's it's it's sad. It's
Speaker 3: sad to see all this happening. But I mean, you
Speaker 3: look at some of the stuff he's reporting. Kane is
Speaker 3: claiming he put the restrictions on the card because he's
Speaker 3: the other guy. Sorry, Sean spent four hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 3: on the American Express card in one month. One month.
Speaker 3: I think I could live off of that much money
Speaker 3: for the rest of my life and he spent that
Speaker 3: one month.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's crazy.
Speaker 3: And American Express is the one that you got to
Speaker 3: pay off everything the next month. You can't carry a
Speaker 3: balance on that sucker. So one dude does four hundred thousand,
Speaker 3: and everybody else is even just using it reasonably like
Speaker 3: they're supposed to. That's a heck of a month filled
Speaker 3: the way. Jeez, gonna buy a house, buy a couple.
Speaker 2: Of houses, Yeah, you can do a whole lot.
Speaker 1: That's crazy, says In a statement to Billboard, Kaine's attorney
Speaker 1: said Liebisman. Leibsman stressed that his client was not seeking
Speaker 1: damages and only wanted to resolve the impasse.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: It is expected that the third director will provide resolution
Speaker 1: to the issues between John and Neil. It is John's
Speaker 1: intent for Journey to continue providing great live music throughout
Speaker 1: the current tour. Unquote, an attorney who was who has
Speaker 1: represented Sean in his previous litigation with Kin, did not
Speaker 1: return a request for comment. Okay, And then it gets
Speaker 1: to what I was talking about earlier. It says here
Speaker 1: even before Sean and Kin came to blows, members of
Speaker 1: Journey had been sparring in court for years. Back in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, the two men teamed up to file a
Speaker 1: lawsuit against former drummer Steve Smith Steven Smith that's rights,
Speaker 1: I couldn't remember his last name, and former bassist Ross
Speaker 1: Valerie over the band's name, and in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: former lead singer Steve Perry took legal action to help
Speaker 1: Sean and Kane from registering Oh I'm sorry to stop,
Speaker 1: Rather not to help, but to stop Sean and Kane
Speaker 1: from registering federal trademarks on the names of many of
Speaker 1: the band's biggest hits.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I remember that.
Speaker 1: That was interesting too, Yeah, because part of what when
Speaker 1: Neil Shawn and his wife started looking into things, part
Speaker 1: of what they realized was that you know, somebody could,
Speaker 1: for example, make a T shirt that says don't stop
Speaker 1: believing on it, and you know, well, why aren't we
Speaker 1: making that money when people here don't stop believing they
Speaker 1: think of our song, you know, we should register these trademarks.
Speaker 1: And and you know, Steve Perry's going, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: I wrote those lyrics. Why do you get to trademark that?
Speaker 2: You know? So he actually helped prevent them from doing that.
Speaker 3: Why wasn't it done under the company? Like it makes
Speaker 3: I get what they're.
Speaker 1: Saying, Well, it probably was, but but Steve Perry said, nope,
Speaker 1: you're not doing that.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't blame him, You blame like you said,
Speaker 3: he still has ownership. Yeah, he may not be in
Speaker 3: the decision room, which it sounds like it's not a
Speaker 3: fun place to be anyway, Right, I wouldn't blame them
Speaker 3: one bit. Yeah, it's awful how these bands have devolved
Speaker 3: into this, you know what I'm saying, Like, Yeah, I
Speaker 3: mean when I can think back when I was a
Speaker 3: kid and they look so fun and happy, Like what
Speaker 3: happened to you? Guys? You're fun and happy? Now they're
Speaker 3: sueing each other. Although I can't blame them all right,
Speaker 3: I'm sorry. If we had a business and all of
Speaker 3: a sudden, you're looking at a four hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 3: bill on one of your charge cards by one person
Speaker 3: in the business, I'd lose my mind. Yeah, I can't
Speaker 3: even imagine seeing a bill like that and not losing
Speaker 3: your mind. And what is the other guy thinking? Is
Speaker 3: he going like I deserve this? So I'm just gonna
Speaker 3: keep pulling this card out like I deserve this. I mean,
Speaker 3: you got to tell yourself something to talk yourself into
Speaker 3: making it to rent a ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: I disagree.
Speaker 1: I don't think you have to talk yourself into anything
Speaker 1: at that point when you're that rich and you're that famous.
Speaker 1: I think something happens psychologically where no, I don't think they.
Speaker 1: I think that's the problem. They don't have to talk
Speaker 1: themselves into anything. And a lot of famous people, people
Speaker 1: who've been very wealthy, who then they go through a
Speaker 1: thing where they have it and then they lose it
Speaker 1: all they talk about this how at the height of
Speaker 1: their fame and wealth, they just kind of assume they
Speaker 1: get into this mindset where they just assume it's going
Speaker 1: to be that way forever. They're going to be super
Speaker 1: famous forever, the money's going to be coming in forever,
Speaker 1: so they can spend as much as they want to
Speaker 1: and never have to worry about it, and it just
Speaker 1: becomes a thing. And in Journeys case, not that I'm
Speaker 1: justifying it, but you can almost see where because he Journey,
Speaker 1: you have a band that was at their peak in
Speaker 1: the eighties but has actually still managed to I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, haven't had a hit song in decades, but
Speaker 1: they still love the classics, and they still do so
Speaker 1: much business touring. They can still tour arenas and and
Speaker 1: still make so much money. And that's really where the
Speaker 1: money is anyway, That and merchandising and and so in
Speaker 1: their case, the money actually has never stopped coming.
Speaker 3: So but this is a grotesque greed that's involved in that.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry because I mean, I can't I if I
Speaker 3: had all of this, I won the lottery, I have
Speaker 3: money now. I still I wouldn't want to go buy
Speaker 3: a ginormous frickin' mansion that costs a fortune to run
Speaker 3: and takes incredible amounts of work to clean. I'd want
Speaker 3: a nice, little small place that has a little garden,
Speaker 3: makes me happy and money in the bank to sustain
Speaker 3: me for the rest of my days. I just I
Speaker 3: always I'm always in It's always mind boggling when you
Speaker 3: look at some of these people and it's like, why
Speaker 3: did you buy that ginormous house for two people? How
Speaker 3: does that work? Why is that worth it? Why is
Speaker 3: it worth it to have a five hundred dollars electric bill?
Speaker 3: And you know, I imagine a three hundred dollars gas bill.
Speaker 3: I mean, I can't imagine how much it costs just
Speaker 3: to run the house itself. Now, how much work does
Speaker 3: it take to upkeep it, clean it, to paint, to
Speaker 3: fix it. I mean I watch my dad upkeep his house,
Speaker 3: and he's meticulous. This house is gorgeous, but he works
Speaker 3: his bum off all the time, every week, every year,
Speaker 3: every month to keep that house looking that way. It
Speaker 3: takes work to keep it that way. It doesn't just
Speaker 3: magically stay that way. These guys get this money and
Speaker 3: they buy these monstrosities of homes. And I've got ten cars.
Speaker 3: Why you can only drive one at a time. Why
Speaker 3: why is it that when you get some money in
Speaker 3: your hands, all of a sudden, there's this grotesque greed
Speaker 3: and you forget all of the decency that you used
Speaker 3: to be, or the decent things you used to say,
Speaker 3: or the things you used to Oh gee, I wish
Speaker 3: I could do this? Or do you wish I could
Speaker 3: help that one? But then the minute the money gets
Speaker 3: into the hand, it's like you forget all of that, right,
Speaker 3: But these yeah, something happens. I think you're right, something
Speaker 3: happens to these people's brains that they think, well, since
Speaker 3: I always have this, I should I must own a
Speaker 3: four million dollar ginormous home that I only live in
Speaker 3: two rooms of, because really, you can't enjoy a house that.
Speaker 3: How do you enjoy a house that being a one person?
Speaker 1: I come on, I think it's probably for people it's
Speaker 1: just all about status. It's ego showing off an ego.
Speaker 1: And I know everyone says this, but I really do
Speaker 1: think it's It's true in my case and in yours too.
Speaker 1: But yeah, if I if I had that kind of money,
Speaker 1: that's not where I would put it because I'm something
Speaker 1: of a minimalist, like I don't want Like, there's nothing
Speaker 1: about the idea of living in a mansion with rooms
Speaker 1: I don't even use, just to have it. There's nothing
Speaker 1: about that that appeals to me. No, theres nothing about
Speaker 1: it that appeals to me.
Speaker 3: Of course, my brain goes to, you know, it's how
Speaker 3: much upkeep that is. But yeah, but plus I like
Speaker 3: small and cozy.
Speaker 2: But I think I think most people though it is.
Speaker 1: It is strange, and it's something I've noticed from what
Speaker 1: I realized this from a pretty young age.
Speaker 2: Most people, if you talk to them about about what
Speaker 2: it would be like to be rich, they do.
Speaker 1: They will tell you, oh, yeah, I'd have ten cars
Speaker 1: and a mansion, and it's like, really, you wouldn't, You
Speaker 1: wouldn't that's what you would do. Like I do think
Speaker 1: there's something in the human condition where most people I
Speaker 1: think we're the odd ones.
Speaker 2: I think I think most people, yeah, that's what they
Speaker 2: think about.
Speaker 3: And it's like, why, but I only need to drive
Speaker 3: one car at a time. I could take two cars
Speaker 3: and be quite content and take the other eight cars
Speaker 3: and go feed like an entire freaking school system. There's
Speaker 3: so much you could do with that crazy amount of money. Yeah,
Speaker 3: you know what I mean that I can't. It's like
Speaker 3: people who spend thousands of dollars on these red bottom shoes.
Speaker 3: I can't understand it to me because to spend thousands
Speaker 3: of dollars on a pair of shoes, to me sounds
Speaker 3: like grotesque greed. Like I don't need a decent pair
Speaker 3: of shoes doesn't cost that much because I grew up though,
Speaker 3: I grew up with a dad that taught me the
Speaker 3: value of a dollar, you know, So you know, you
Speaker 3: didn't take anything for granted. If you got a pair.
Speaker 3: When I got to go to the shoes store and
Speaker 3: I got to come home with two or three pairs
Speaker 3: of shoes, that was a big deal. To get two
Speaker 3: pairs or to get three pairs, that was a big deal.
Speaker 3: That was that was money. And for us, you know,
Speaker 3: it's not a pair of shoes, but ooh, I got
Speaker 3: your dress shoes and sneakers like that was a big deal.
Speaker 3: To be able to do that. I can't imagine. I
Speaker 3: don't know. I guess yeah, maybe we are the odd
Speaker 3: balls out. It's just it takes very little to make
Speaker 3: me happy. And I can't imagine wasting so much money
Speaker 3: when there's so much in the world that you could
Speaker 3: do to make I make. How many lives did you
Speaker 3: save with one car?
Speaker 2: Hill?
Speaker 4: Hello?
Speaker 2: Hello?
Speaker 4: Is this the mass?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: My goodness is this John C.
Speaker 3: Hopwood?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm listening to your conversation. Uh, I don't know
Speaker 4: how old was Journey when they made it big? How
Speaker 4: what was the average age.
Speaker 3: They were pretty young, weren't they.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they had to be pretty young.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna guess and say I'm gonna guess in say
Speaker 1: twenty five.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think there's a big difference, though. Richard Burretton
Speaker 4: always said there's a big difference becoming really famous when
Speaker 4: you're very young, like Elizabeth Taylor and Marion and Brando
Speaker 4: where it was almost forty when he became famous and rich.
Speaker 4: You know, you're immature, right, and so you buy your toys.
Speaker 4: But with the Beatles, who were you know, very young
Speaker 4: when they got rich. Both think houses and everything were
Speaker 4: tacked right off. So I just thought I brought that.
Speaker 4: Bring that great? Shall miss you?
Speaker 2: Take care all right, Thanks for the call time. I
Speaker 2: appreciate it, bub Bye.
Speaker 3: It was nice.
Speaker 2: We haven't heard from John and Alote.
Speaker 1: I know, yeah, is he on the other side of
Speaker 1: the world now, I'm not sure. He sounded like he
Speaker 1: was on a train or something. It's very loud. No,
Speaker 1: it was nice to hear from him though. Yeah, uh,
Speaker 1: I wonder you know, to John's point about how they
Speaker 1: were very young.
Speaker 3: Well, that has an aspect of course, because when I
Speaker 3: was younger, I was very stupid now that I look
Speaker 3: back on myself.
Speaker 1: And I wonder, I wonder John's observation. I wonder if
Speaker 1: that that's gotta be thinking, Is that part of the
Speaker 1: problem if you become if you do become so successful
Speaker 1: so young, and you have all that money, you establish
Speaker 1: a pattern. You know, I was an atherrapist. We talk
Speaker 1: a lot about patterns. You establish a pattern of spending
Speaker 1: recklessly and foolishly and not practically and uh, and so
Speaker 1: whereas as John said, like Richard Burton, who you know,
Speaker 1: didn't become wealthy until he was in its forties, if
Speaker 1: you become wealthy at an older age, you're you're going
Speaker 1: to be more practical and maybe and maybe not be
Speaker 1: so foolish as to just assume this gravy train's gonna
Speaker 1: go forever. And again, in the case of Journey, it
Speaker 1: actually has gone forever. But but uh, but a little
Speaker 1: more practical with your money.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I mean, I think that's an interesting point.
Speaker 3: It is like the I mean, to spend money the
Speaker 3: way that that was being spent, it has to you
Speaker 3: have to have the mindset of an there's no bottom,
Speaker 3: there's no there's no my wallet will never be empty, right,
Speaker 3: it has got to be your feeling if you can
Speaker 3: sign up for a ten thousand dollar hotel room. I mean,
Speaker 3: that's just mind boggling to me. Ten grand for one
Speaker 3: night is so insane.
Speaker 2: Right, I just can't.
Speaker 3: I couldn't do that. I could not do that and
Speaker 3: look myself in the mirror. I just couldn't.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I couldn't.
Speaker 3: I could freaking fill a food pantry to the seal.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna spend ten grand on one night in a hotel?
Speaker 3: Does this hotel have.
Speaker 2: The other thing too? About age?
Speaker 1: You know, because like I said, John brought up you know,
Speaker 1: they were probably very young when they established these patterns.
Speaker 1: Is and I said the same thing when we were
Speaker 1: talking about the I've said this actually while when we
Speaker 1: talked about the Daryl Hall versus John Oat lawsuit, and
Speaker 1: also in talking about Don Henley. It's like these guys,
Speaker 1: these guys in Journey now they're in their seventies. Is
Speaker 1: this what you want to be doing when you're in
Speaker 1: your seventies, tied up in all this litigation.
Speaker 3: The money, like blind with money, I know.
Speaker 1: But it's like geez, just ah, see them, just do
Speaker 1: your thing. I mean, these guys like, I mean, you.
Speaker 3: Took a dollar too much.
Speaker 2: They're so lucky. They're so fortunate not only to.
Speaker 3: Not only to have this, but to have their health,
Speaker 3: to be able to do what they're doing. And they
Speaker 3: have all this money at their fingertips. They'll never not
Speaker 3: want for nothing. Right, they don't worry about clothing or
Speaker 3: food or any of that. They have nothing to worry about.
Speaker 1: But this is what they're I mean, Journey's canceling shows now,
Speaker 1: this is what they're gonna this is what they're gonna
Speaker 1: spend their time on.
Speaker 3: And this is how they're gonna go out. At this point,
Speaker 3: it satisfy.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it doesn't go out that way. That's what
Speaker 1: I said about Darryl Hall and John Oates. It's like,
Speaker 1: oh my god, the biggest selling duo in pop history,
Speaker 1: all the money they could ever need, all the fame,
Speaker 1: you know, and again they they've sustained, you know, they've
Speaker 1: sustained this over so many decades. Yeah, and this is
Speaker 1: how it ends. This is how it litigation.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so you're not gonna talk at you if we
Speaker 3: go on stage together, it's opposite sides. You stay on
Speaker 3: your side, I'll stay on my side. And it's and
Speaker 3: all of it comes down to the one. It's the
Speaker 3: ego of money. Yeah, it's all about ego and money.
Speaker 1: And if you're if you're a twenty something, you know,
Speaker 1: and you have a conflict with somebody, you know, you
Speaker 1: kind of take it. And you shouldn't take it for
Speaker 1: granted because anything can happen, but you kind of take
Speaker 1: it for granted you had all the time in the world.
Speaker 1: At some point, someday you'll rectify things, you'll make up,
Speaker 1: everything will be good, you'll get back together, it'll work out.
Speaker 1: But you know, when you're in your mid seventies and
Speaker 1: you're fighting with somebody over a money or over a contract,
Speaker 1: it's like, you know again, I think if Daryl Hall
Speaker 1: and John Oates, because I'm such a I grew up
Speaker 1: such a huge Hall and Oates fan, it's like, and
Speaker 1: this is how, this is how it's going to end
Speaker 1: for them, you know. And Daryl hasn't said much about
Speaker 1: it John lately. John has said in interviews when asked,
Speaker 1: you know or you and Daryl do you think you
Speaker 1: and Darrel are going to reconcile at some point?
Speaker 2: He said, probably not. This is probably it.
Speaker 1: And it's like, oh, my God, and he you know,
Speaker 1: and honestly, I mean it's the one silver lining with
Speaker 1: that is John Oates from what I've seen in the
Speaker 1: interviews when he's talking about it, you know, I'm sure
Speaker 1: he carries a sadness about the situation, but he also
Speaker 1: seems like a little bit of a weight spin lifted
Speaker 1: off of him. And Daryl probably feels that way too,
Speaker 1: because Daryl Hall was clearly resentful of having to share.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to success with John, But I want
Speaker 1: to go back to.
Speaker 3: What I said something earlier. It is like people getting divorced. Now,
Speaker 3: these guys got together, they were in love with each other,
Speaker 3: they made music together, that's literally together for so long
Speaker 3: that they start nitpicking at each other. Little things start
Speaker 3: annoying each other, and they stay together too long and
Speaker 3: they end up presenting each other.
Speaker 2: Yes, well that's literally what Daryl. Daryl said, he referred
Speaker 2: to it as a global divorce.
Speaker 3: It is, and a lot of reason. It's so sad.
Speaker 3: It's so sad. I'm sad for that.
Speaker 1: Well, we only have a little bit of time left
Speaker 1: in the hour. But moving on from journey just for
Speaker 1: a moment, because this is somewhat excuse me. This is
Speaker 1: somewhat related. I apologize I didn't get to the button
Speaker 1: in time before I coughed. I'm not sick, just my
Speaker 1: allergies continue to This has been a bad summer for
Speaker 1: allergies for me.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But you know this year we talk about people.
Speaker 1: They get used to spending the money and they you
Speaker 1: see this a lot in hip hop. They you know,
Speaker 1: the autom eventually falls out. Also from Billboard dot com,
Speaker 1: Damon Dash is Rockefella, which is a very famous record
Speaker 1: label in hip hop. Rockefeller shares will be auctioned to
Speaker 1: pay legal judgments. This is from Billboard dot com and
Speaker 1: I haven't followed this particular story, but it says Damon
Speaker 1: Dash is one third stake in Jay Z's Rockefeller Records
Speaker 1: is going up for auction later this month, but a
Speaker 1: source tells Billboard that the shows might come with some
Speaker 1: the shares rather might come with some key limitations. According
Speaker 1: to federal court filings, this week, the US Marshall Service
Speaker 1: will auction off Damon Dash's thirty three and a third
Speaker 1: interest in the storied record company to satisfy an eight
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty three thousand dollars judgment against him in
Speaker 1: a lawsuit filed by movie producer Josh Weber over a
Speaker 1: failed film partnership. The auction is set for August twenty
Speaker 1: nine at a midtown Manhattan hotel. We'll have a minimum
Speaker 1: bit of one point two million dollars. I don't want
Speaker 1: to get in all the math of it, but skipping
Speaker 1: down just quickly. The sale will be for Dash's Steak
Speaker 1: and Rockefeller, Inc, An entity whose primary assets are the
Speaker 1: rights to Jay Z's iconic debut album Reasonable Doubt. According
Speaker 1: to an April article by Rolling Stone, the rest of
Speaker 1: the catalog of music released by Rockefella, which is dissolved
Speaker 1: as an operational label in twenty thirteen, is owned by
Speaker 1: other entities and is not involved the owner of the
Speaker 1: other two thirds of Rockefeller Label. Co founders Jay Z
Speaker 1: and Kareem Biggs Burke, have already attempted to stop the auction,
Speaker 1: including making changes to the company's bylaws and interviewing in
Speaker 1: the lawsuit. I'm sorry intervening rather in the lawsuit, but
Speaker 1: a federal judge rejected such opposition in February, and we
Speaker 1: won't go through it. This is a long involved article.
Speaker 1: Maybe we'll revisit this in the future, but I do
Speaker 1: have to wonder if some of the attorneys involved in
Speaker 1: this are you know, do they hire law firms that
Speaker 1: have also been used by the members of Journey in
Speaker 1: their uh legal misadventures with each other.
Speaker 2: It just goes on and on.
Podbean